Enbridge won approval in December to replace a pipeline segment that runs under the Great Lakes, only to face swift legal challenges from two environmental groups.
The Environmental Law and Policy Center (ELPC) and the Michigan Climate Action Network filed an appeal against the decision by the Michigan Public Service Commission (MPSC) with the Michigan Court of Appeals on Dec. 22.
“One of the Commission’s primary responsibilities under Michigan law is to evaluate whether there are feasible and prudent alternatives to projects like this that will pose fewer environmental risks and cost less money,” Scott Strand, senior attorney at the ELPC, said in a Dec. 22 release. “But the Commission simply refused to consider the best alternative out there, which is simply to shut down the old Line 5 pipelines under the Straits and not replace them with a new pipeline at all.”
The Line 5 pipeline runs across the Mackinac Strait that separates Lake Michigan and Lake Huron. Line 5 is a twin pipeline with a capacity of 540,000 bbl/d that carries crude and NGL. Enbridge proposes to replace the two lines with a single line in a concrete tunnel below the lakebed.
Enbridge still needs approval from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to proceed. The company praised the Michigan Public Service Commission for the approval.
“Enbridge would like to thank everyone who provided public comment on the project. We are also grateful to the organizations that intervened in the MPSC approval process to advance the project, including the National and Michigan Propane Associations, and the Michigan Laborers’ District Council,” Enbridge spokesperson Ryan Duffy said in a statement. “The input from intervenors on both sides of the issue raised important questions that challenge us all to get this right.”
Line 5, built in 1953 supplies 55% of Michigan's statewide propane needs, according to Enbridge.
Recommended Reading
Exclusive: The Politics, Realities and Benefits of Natural Gas
2024-04-19 - Replacing just 5% of coal-fired power plants with U.S. LNG — even at average methane and greenhouse-gas emissions intensity — could reduce energy sector emissions by 30% globally, says Chris Treanor, PAGE Coalition executive director.
CERAWeek: Energy Secretary Defends LNG Pause Amid Industry Outcry
2024-03-18 - U.S. Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm said she expects the review of LNG exports to be in the “rearview mirror” by next year.
Belcher: Election Year LNG ‘Pause’ Will Have Huge Negative Impacts
2024-03-01 - The Biden administration’s decision to pause permitting of LNG projects has damaged the U.S.’ reputation in ways impossible to calculate.
Hirs: LNG Plan is a Global Fail
2024-03-13 - Only by expanding U.S. LNG output can we provide the certainty that customers require to build new gas power plants, says Ed Hirs.
Watson: Implications of LNG Pause
2024-03-07 - Critical questions remain for LNG on the heels of the Biden administration's pause on LNG export permits to non-Free Trade Agreement countries.