Presented by:
Editor's note: This article appears in the E&P newsletter. Subscribe here.
The increasing scrutiny on induced seismicity and the desire to reduce groundwater consumption has led to increasing rates of produced water recycling in the Permian Basin among E&P operators. However, once an operator has completed its development and no longer has a need for recycled volumes, the end result is produced water injection.
Historically, operators have been hesitant to share their own produced water infrastructure with other operators due to liability and timing challenges, but with the development of third-party water midstream infrastructure, produced water can continue to be recycled in areas of completed developments and moved via large-diameter pipe to areas with upcoming completions.
XRI, a water midstream operator in the Permian, has more than 350 miles of permanent, large-diameter pipeline infrastructure and an aggregated system capacity to run approximately 1.25 MMbbl/d so as to provide full-cycle water solutions to its E&P customers and saving 180 MMbbl of produced water from being injected annually.
In Midland County, XRI’s system consists of more than 50 miles of large-diameter pipelines serving the most active operators in the county. The system has evolved from supplying non-potable brackish groundwater to incorporating produced water takeaway and recycled water supply to meet the growing request for produced water utilization in completions.
Midland County case study
Operator A inquired XRI about the availability of treated produced water for its completions in an area where it did not previously utilize produced water. Approximately 20 miles away on XRI’s pipeline system, Operator B independently inquired XRI about taking away excess produced water with its completions activities located out of the area. Operator A’s volume needs allowed 100% utilization of the excess water as well as water in Operator B’s system that would have been injected.
However, Operator A’s completion schedule was not aligned when Operator B’s peak occurred. XRI was then able to utilize an interconnect with Operator C's pit to store’s Operator B excess volumes until Operator A’s completion started.
Operator C's stored pit volumes were used to end the completion to allow Operator B's produced water volumes to be prepared for another completion in the same manner. Peak rates for this project were in excess of 100,000 bbl/d, and in total 3.3 MMbbl of produced water was recycled as opposed to injection.
Recommended Reading
Despite Growth of CCS Projects, Profitability Remains Elusive
2024-12-04 - While costs are declining, CCS technologies remain expensive, with EOR and tax incentives spurring projects to capture and store CO₂.
SLB Capturi Completes Its First Modular Carbon Capture Plant
2025-01-23 - The Netherlands facility will capture up to 100,000 metric tons of CO2 annually, SLB said in a news release.
SLB Capturi Completes First Industrial-Scale CCS Facility
2024-12-03 - SLB Capturi, a JV between SLB and Aker Carbon Capture, said it had reached a milestone with the world’s first industrial-scale carbon capture plant at a cement facility.
First Ammonia Awards FEED Contract to Worley for Gulf Coast Facility
2025-01-27 - First Ammonia awarded a FEED contract to Worley for its electric ammonia facility in Victoria, Texas, along the Gulf Coast.
California Resources Advances California’s First CCS Project
2025-01-06 - California Resources Corp. will invest between $14 million and $18 million to capture the CO2, the company said in a news release.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.