Presented by:
Editor's note: This article appears in the E&P newsletter. Subscribe to the E&P newsletter here.
Sustainability has become a corporate imperative, regardless of the industry. Such changes push offshore oil and gas solution providers to adapt their supply chain and rethink their solutions from an environmental standpoint. While “intelligent” and “sustainable” are becoming synonymous with today’s engineering standards, what makes an offshore platform design fit “new normal” sustainability demands?
The new market context
The global focus on carbon emissions reduction is no longer a breaking news agenda, but rather a “new normal” context to which global industries and markets have to adjust—including some hard to decarbonize sectors, such as oil and gas. But what does sustainability mean for offshore energy platforms?
For engineering companies operating in offshore energy, sustainability means considering two sides of the coin: the environmental impact created not only when building a product, but also while using and then decommissioning it. In other words, a sustainable platform design is one that has considered the full platform life cycle—from the initial design, fabrication and installation to the ongoing operations, maintenance and finally decommissioning.
This holistic approach requires a complete rethink of design philosophy—one that challenges conventional equipment choices at all stages and thinks of the installation limitations from day one.
Offshore platform design: Less is more
When designing a sustainable offshore platform, it is best to try and stick to a minimalist aesthetic, if project requirements will allow. By designing platforms to require fewer components offshore, and by reducing materials used for those components (e.g., by using less steel), emissions can be reduced throughout the fabrication, transportation and installation processes.
First, engineers need to calculate all the potential causes of greater carbon emissions when creating a solution. It requires each piece of equipment, and its lifecycle, to be identified and challenged. At Aquaterra Energy, we do this via our own carbon calculator developed specifically for our engineers to use throughout the design process, calculating material weights and the supply chain’s carbon impact. We seek to take this even further by inspecting how existing in-country infrastructure can be used for offshore platform installation to create additional emission savings.
For example, why sail a heavy lift barge from Rotterdam to West Africa when you can design a platform installation solution that uses a jack-up rig and/or vessels that are already there? It’s well known that maritime transport emits around 940 million tonnes of CO₂ annually, and therefore minimizing the need for offshore installation trips will substantially reduce, not only an offshore platform’s carbon footprint, but that of the industry at large.
It takes two to tango: digitalization and renewables
Designing a self-powered offshore platform might be a novel concept today, but it will become mundane moving forward. Incorporating renewable power into platform design is where Aquaterra Energy sees the future of powering offshore oil and gas platforms.
Using renewable technologies like wind turbines and solar banks creates a self-sufficient solution that does not require traditional diesel generators for power. This not only significantly reduces the overall lifetime emissions of the platform, but also those that are associated with the ongoing maintenance and logistics for refueling visits. In situations when the amount of power generated by local solar and wind is insufficient to meet platform power requirements, operators can look at implementing backup solutions. Solutions such as installing a battery pack for intermittency, or by connecting to adjacent larger-scale renewable offshore sources can both provide alternative power supplies should it be needed.
But an offshore platform’s efficiency does not have to stop at its energy source. Implementing intelligent, digital monitoring solutions that are managed through onshore systems support by further minimizing required maintenance trips and can help to reduce the number of personnel required offshore. Such solutions not only have a positive impact on transport emissions, but also enhance safety as they help to eliminate some of the inherent risks of working offshore. Here, digital advancements complement renewable solutions and result in low-power emissions, and a low-risk platform.
Smart supply chains: balancing the “E” and “S” of ESG
While we considered how the platform’s installation and operations affect design philosophy, the fabrication stage also plays an important role in executing a sustainable solution.
For projects in developing economies, there is often a push for operators and their suppliers to utilize local content for both the operation and fabrication of the project. And while it supports the ‘S’ in ESG, it might have a negative impact on the ‘E’ side, such as when the country the platform is destined for does not locally produce the raw materials required. In these cases the raw materials must be shipped in, potentially incurring large and unavoidable carbon emissions related to the transport. This creates a balancing act.
If this is the case, then shipment should be delivered in the most environmentally friendly manner available. For example, looking for the closest supplier to your project’s location minimizes total distance traveled and therefore will reduce transportation emissions, albeit not avoid them. Intelligent, informed balancing between maximizing local development and local content needs plus minimizing marine transport where possible is what gives a real competitive advantage to service providers.
A novel design philosophy
Balancing between short-term project limitations and long-term sustainability goals is not a question of technological capabilities, but one that depends on the commitment of operators and their engineering partners. The energy transition is a challenging task and those taking part in it must accustom themselves with being challenged. For offshore oil and gas operators that means shifting from the conventional towards novel alternatives, like renewable power. For engineering service providers developing new offshore platforms means implementing a new design philosophy that centers around lowering emissions at all the stages of the platform’s life—from supply chain to decommissioning. And while there is no set route to building a sustainable solution, there is a set destination—an offshore platform which minimizes its environmental impact as much as possible.
Stewart Maxwell serves as technical director at Aquaterra Energy Ltd. In this role, he is responsible driving technical innovations across all parts of the business. Maxwell also leads the platforms solutions within Aquaterra Energy including the flagship Sea Swift and renewable-powered platforms.
Recommended Reading
New York to Fine Fossil Fuel Companies $75B Under New Climate Law
2024-12-26 - New York state will fine fossil fuel companies a total of $75 billion over the next 25 years to pay for damage caused to the climate.
EQT’s Rice: ‘Wake Up’ to Anti-Energy Movement
2024-11-08 - In the face of growing opposition to fossil fuels and energy infrastructure, EQT CEO Toby Rice pulled out a rallying cry at Hart Energy’s DUG Appalachia conference: “Wake up!”
Biden-Led EPA Rolls Out Methane Fee Targeting Oil, Gas Emitters
2024-11-12 - Companies violating the new Environmental Protection Agency rules will start paying penalties next year based on methane emissions reported in calendar year 2024.
Q&A: Making Midstream’s Case in DC
2024-11-08 - GPA Midstream Association President and CEO Sarah Miller spoke with Oil and Gas Investor on working with the industry’s needs and defending the sector in Washington, D.C.
US Supreme Court Should Avoid Climate Change Cases, Biden Administration Says
2024-12-11 - The Biden administration is urging the U.S. Supreme Court to reject efforts by oil companies to prevent lawsuits accusing the fossil fuel producers of deceiving the public about climate change.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.