It is commonly understood that one of the true focuses of today’s oil and gas industry is optimized production throughout the lifecycle of a field. Along with that focus, there is a
![]() |
|
Figure 1. Soundwaves are transmitted from sources to receivers in the crosswell process. (Images courtesy of Z-Seis) |
Crosswell imaging
One technology currently being effectively used to assist in the visualization of the reservoir and its interwell environment is crosswell imaging. Crosswell imaging is on the leading edge of reservoir visualization technology, providing for the first time a true high-resolution view of the interwell area, including the reservoir and its structural characteristics. In contrast to conventional surface seismic, crosswell imaging goes beyond providing a basic aerial view of the reservoir, filling in what has been a dearth of information concerning the vertical space between wells.
Crosswell imaging produces a heretofore unheard-of depth of data to generate this high-resolution view, up to 100 times greater than the imaging resolution of surface seismic. Crosswell operations normally employ a transmitting source, which is lowered into one well, and a series of receivers, which are lowered into one or multiple adjacent wells. Specially engineered sound waves (typically 100 to 2,000 Hz) are passed between the source and receiver, traveling through the interwell section. Positioned at appropriate locations within a given reservoir, the source and receivers are moved vertically through the well bore, passing sound waves through the interwell area at various depths. This vertical movement of the source and receivers allows the sound waves to project across the interwell area at various angles, providing even more detail of the interwell environment between them. Since this data can be generated for up to a kilometer between wells, detailed information concerning the interwell section and reservoir is provided over a broad expanse of space.
The specially engineered crosswell sound waves that are transmitted from the source to the receivers attenuate at different rates, depending on the material they pass through in their
![]() |
|
Figure 2. A successful CO2 operation as modeled by crosswell imaging. |
Better reservoir understanding
With the increased use of crosswell imaging in the development of highly detailed attenuation studies, reservoir engineers now have an effective tool for accurately compartmentalizing reservoirs. These same studies also provide a better understanding of partially saturated reservoirs and rock permeability. In addition, crosswell imaging is capable of detailing fluid mobility and reservoir dynamics during enhanced oil recovery (EOR) operations.
Historical attempts at gauging permeability using surface seismic tools have delivered mixed results, due for the most part to the inherently thin nature of permeable zones. These critical zones can escape notice in the context of lower-resolution surface seismic operations. Crosswell techniques, by contrast, provide the high-resolution imaging that is capable of detailing these zones.
Using surface seismic to pinpoint changes in reservoirs is problematic as well, based on the fact that its limited aerial view almost pre-supposes homogeneity in a primarily heterogeneous environment. By comparison, crosswell imaging provides a true multilayered view, including a detailed visualization of structural changes and permeability. The benefit to be realized from this vastly improved view of the reservoir is the ability to directly identify reservoir characteristics as opposed to having to rely on the complex extrapolations that are part of surface seismic visualization technology.
Characterizing carbonate reefs
A recent application of crosswell imaging involving the Silurian Pinnacle Reef in the Niagaran Trend of the Michigan Basin provides an outstanding example of the value of this technology. This two-week project used crosswell sources and receivers spaced at 2,000 ft (610 m) apart. The project design called for the sources to transmit at frequencies ranging from 40 Hz
![]() |
|
Figure 3. A crosswell image tomograph provides an indication of a carbonate reef in the Niagaran Trend area. |
The results from the crosswell imaging were critical to the identification of the additional production opportunities available in this region. A direct velocity correlation between sonic data was determined in addition to the development of a detailed, accurate tomograph. Also, differences were observed in zones that exhibited significantly more density contrast. This contrast was established as being generated by salt layers as compared to the high velocity output imaging recorded from carbonate and dolomite structures. Lateral velocity changes also were identified within the reservoir, and the top reservoir layer was determined to be located at 4,700 ft, with the bottom at approximately 5,000 ft.
The future
The industry is increasingly focused on maximizing the production potential of both new and existing reservoirs. In response to this focus, exciting advanced technologies such as crosswell imaging are being used more often to provide a level of ultra-high resolution information that can reliably support drilling, production and EOR operations. As demands for more in-depth understanding of interwell and reservoir structures increase, these productive technologies will continue to grow as an accepted tool for the geophysicist and reservoir engineer.
Recommended Reading
Dividends Declared Week of Feb. 17
2025-02-21 - 2024 year-end earnings season is underway. Here is a compilation of dividends declared from select upstream, midstream, downstream and service and supply companies.
Viper Makes Leadership Changes Alongside Diamondback CEO Shakeup
2025-02-21 - Viper Energy is making leadership changes alongside a similar shake-up underway at its parent company Diamondback Energy.
Diamondback’s Stice to Step Down as CEO, Van’t Hof to Succeed
2025-02-20 - Diamondback CEO Travis Stice, who led the company through an IPO in 2012 and a $26 billion acquisition last year, will step down as CEO later this year.
SM Energy Restructures Leadership Team
2025-02-20 - SM Energy Co. has made several officer appointments and announced the retirement of Jennifer Martin Samuels, the company’s vice president of investor relations and ESG stewardship.
Q&A: Petrie Partners Co-Founder Offers the Private Equity Perspective
2025-02-19 - Applying veteran wisdom to the oil and gas finance landscape, trends for 2025 begin to emerge.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.