Some recent findings on the Stack/Scoop/Cana plays’ productivity evolution may come as a surprise. A recent Baird Equity Research report on U.S. basin trends placed the Midcontinent plays at the bottom for their trend in productivity per average well.
The Baird team research, led by senior analyst Joseph Allman, was drawn from a dataset including 82 months of production data and more than 60,000 wells to distill total basin/play productivity per average well. The basins and plays studied were the Delaware, Midland, Stack/Scoop/Cana, Eagle Ford, Marcellus, Utica, Bakken, D-J, Powder River, Haynesville and Austin Chalk.
The analysts measured relative rank among these based on productivity consistency and “the magnitude of any productivity change over the past two years.”
Leading productivity and consistency gains were registered by the Austin Chalk, the Utica, the Marcellus and the Bakken. The analysts noted “productivity degradation” in the Stack/Scoop/Cana, however, beginning in mid- to late 2016. Since that time, productivity per average well has seemed to have dropped by 50%.
“It does not mean it is the least productive play, but it measures the trend for the play,” the Baird analysts said.
The study tracked all the new wells (having at least three full months of production) and compared their trends to the 11 other basins/plays in the study over 24 months. “It does not indicate which play is better or worse but only signals changes, both in consistency and magnitude,” according to the report.
Baird’s Basin Trend Index (BTI) would indicate, for instance, that a basin/play accorded a value of 100 would have seen its average well productivity and revenue generation increase by $100,000 per month, or $2.4 million over the two-year period. They used well data from IHS Markit and a price deck of $50/bbl and $3/Mcf to gauge average gross well revenues. There were no deductions for royalties or other working-interest partners, and they did not break out NGLs and their potential revenue uplift. Average lateral length, total well count and average gross revenues per lateral foot for newly producing wells in each period (first 12 months, first six months, first three months and first month) were included.
“Thus, operators with above-average NGLs that trade at a premium price to natural gas might have underrepresented revenues in our study,” the analysts noted.
Baird was motivated to do the study partly by its conviction that “the market has too much focus on 24-hour initial production rates—which can be manipulated easily—and 30-day peak rates, which are better, but do not offer the best representation of how a well will perform ultimately.”
The overall basin/play trend index for three full months of production were Austin Chalk, 107; Utica, 84; Marcellus, 72; Bakken, 59; Powder River, 45; Midland Basin, 30; D-J Basin, 27; Haynesville, 25; Delaware Basin, 24; Eagle Ford, 22; and Stack/Scoop/Cana, -73.
Recommended Reading
US Drillers Cut Oil, Gas Rigs for First Time in Six Weeks
2025-01-10 - The oil and gas rig count fell by five to 584 in the week to Jan. 10, the lowest since November.
On The Market This Week (Jan. 6, 2025)
2025-01-10 - Here is a roundup of listings marketed by select E&Ps during the week of Jan. 6.
Perma-Pipe Gets $43MM Contract for Services in Middle East
2025-01-10 - Texas company Perma-Pipe International Holdings specializes in anti-corrosion services for infrastructure.
Shale Outlook: E&Ps Making More U-Turn Laterals, Problem-Free
2025-01-09 - Of the more than 70 horseshoe wells drilled to date, half came in the first nine months of 2024 as operators found 2-mile, single-section laterals more economic than a pair of 1-mile straight holes.
Murphy’s Vietnam Find May Change Investor Views, KeyBanc Analysts Say
2025-01-09 - The discovery by a subsidiary of Murphy Oil Corp. is a reminder of the company’s exploration prowess, KeyBanc Capital Markets analysts said.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.