Berkshire Hathaway Inc. on May 1 defended its $8 billion proposal to build natural gas plants in Texas to help reduce the threat of devastating blackouts such as those in February.
“When you look at the power sector [in Texas], it fundamentally let the citizens down,” Greg Abel, a Berkshire vice chairman and previous CEO of Berkshire Hathaway Energy, said at the conglomerate’s annual shareholder meeting.
“We’ve gone to Texas with what we believe is a good solution,” he added. “The health and welfare of Texas was at risk, and we needed to effectively have an insurance policy in place for them.”
Berkshire in March proposed building 10 natural gas-powered plants that would supplement the capacity of the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT), which provides electricity to most of the state, and provide backup power in emergencies.
But the proposal reportedly contemplates guaranteed payments to Berkshire, upsetting the deregulated pricing model for Texas’ power market.
The Dallas Morning News said Berkshire is proposing a guaranteed 9.3% rate of return. Berkshire has declined to comment.
Starwood Energy Group, the investment firm, last month proposed its own competing $8 billion plan to build 11 natural gas pants in Texas.
Texas suffered widespread power outages in February because of a fierce winter storm and plunging temperatures.
Electricity prices soared, with some ordinary customers receiving exponentially larger monthly bills, and about 4.5 million Texans were left without power for several days.
Berkshire Chairman Warren Buffett added that Texas “is a terrific place to do business.”
Abel downplayed a reported proposal by Elon Musk, who runs electric car maker Tesla Inc., to build a giant battery that could plug into Texas' power grid and power thousands of homes during hot summers.
He said Berkshire’s plan could help stricken homes and businesses for several days, not merely hours like a battery.
Recommended Reading
Rystad: 12 MMbbl/d at Risk in Full-blown Middle East War
2024-10-17 - A full-blown war in the Middle East could end up with 12 MMbbl/d of oil at risk—leading to high prices and widespread global consequences, according to Rystad Energy.
Trump Tariff Threat Raises Consternation Among Oil Lobbying Groups
2024-11-26 - Late Nov. 25, President-elect Donald Trump said one of his first executive orders would be to enact a 25% tariff on “all products” originating from Canada and Mexico, a move that could escalate refined products prices.
Pitts: How Venezuelan Elections Impact Texas and Louisiana
2024-10-24 - The ramifications of another questionable election in Venezuela comes as Chevron’s quest to recoup debts continues. And Washington’s likely next steps will include more of the same: sanctions.
Trump vs. Harris—Policy Promises vs. Economics
2024-10-22 - The presidential debate did not shed much light on policy initiatives. Are there substantive differences?
Kissler, Wyett: Trump Tariffs and Potential Energy Market Aftershocks
2024-12-20 - U.S. production and prices may increase; global cooperation may decrease; but Trump’s previous tariffs had less of an impact on import prices than the COVID pandemic.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.