The Biden administration has urged a U.S. appeals court to tell a lower court to rethink its order that would require Canadian operator Enbridge to drain portions of an oil pipeline that runs through Native American tribal land in Wisconsin, according to a court filing made public on April 10.
In a friend-of-court brief dated April 8, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) told the Chicago-based 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that forcing Enbridge to drain portions of its Line 5 pipeline could interrupt service in violation of a 1977 treaty between the U.S. and Canada to keep oil flowing.
The U.S., which is not a party to the case, said the lower court was right to find Enbridge is trespassing on the tribal land, but said the court should reconsider its decision ordering Enbridge to stop operating portions of the pipeline by 2026.
Canada, which is also not a party to the case, had previously argued in an amicus brief that the pipeline should be kept open due to the treaty.
The 2019 lawsuit was filed against Enbridge by the Native American tribe the Bad River Band of Lake Superior Chippewa.
Bad River Chairman Robert Blanchard in a statement said the tribe is grateful the U.S. agrees Enbridge is operating on tribal land unlawfully but is "disappointed that the U.S. has not unequivocally called for an immediate end to Enbridge's ongoing trespass."
An Enbridge spokesperson said shutting the pipeline would not be in the public interest, and that the company continues to seek a solution that would not disrupt the flow of oil. The company has offered the Band $80 million to settle the dispute.
The 71-year-old pipeline carries 540,000 bbl/d of mostly Canadian oil from Wisconsin to Ontario and is part of the wider Mainline network.
The brief marks the first time DOJ has weighed in on the dispute since U.S. District Judge William Conley in Madison last year ordered Enbridge to shutter portions of the pipeline that run along a 12-mile (19 km) segment of the Band's reservation in Wisconsin.
He also ordered Enbridge to pay the tribe nearly $5.2 million for trespassing, plus a portion of its profits.
Both sides appealed the decision to the 7th Circuit, which had asked DOJ to weigh in on the issue in December. Judges said they couldn't make a decision without hearing from the U.S. government during oral arguments in February.
In its amicus brief, DOJ also said $5.2 million in restitution is too low, given Enbridge's profits from the pipeline. Enbridge has said it is still legally operating on the land, and is evaluating possible alternative routes for the pipeline.
Recommended Reading
‘Knife Fight’ for NGLs Driving Midstream Mergers in 2024
2024-09-05 - The latest acquisitions in the midstream sector are focusing on natural gas gathering and processing to secure a spot in the lucrative NGL market.
One Equity Partners to Acquire Gas Turbine Services Company EthosEnergy
2024-08-28 - One Equity Partners will buy EthosEnergy, which provides services to power generation and industrial customers operating industrial gas turbines.
TGS, ComboCurve Partner on Asset Evaluation Tech for Dealmakers
2024-08-28 - TGS and ComboCurve said the combination of their technology platforms will cut asset evaluation times from months to days.
For Sale: Grandma’s Minerals
2024-08-16 - A younger generation more open to selling subsurface rights has increased supply for the minerals and royalties market, and Mesa Minerals III is buying up interests in the Permian and Haynesville.
Utah Tar Sands Developers Plan Go-public Deal with SPAC
2024-08-13 - The owners of a Utah tar sand mine project agreed to a go-public combination with a blank-check sponsor.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.