Trans Mountain Corp. plans to begin line fill in March or May on its long-delayed Canadian oil pipeline expansion, depending on the diameter of pipe it uses and assuming no new problems, the Canadian government-owned company said in a filing on Jan. 3.
The company is awaiting a regulatory decision on its request for a construction change.
Line fill is a final step before the expanded Alberta-to-British Columbia pipeline begins service, providing crucial additional access for Canadian oil to refineries on the U.S. West Coast and in Asia.
The project will nearly triple the pipeline's shipments to 890,000 bbl/d.
Trans Mountain said the new schedules assume that it faces no delays caused by challenges drilling into hard rock, such as tool damage. Trans Mountain continues to target the end of the first quarter to begin shipping crude and is developing contingency plans to address any challenges to that schedule, a spokesperson said in an email.
Trans Mountain had asked the Canada Energy Regulator (CER) to allow it to install smaller-diameter pipe in a 1.4-mile (2.3 km) section of the oil pipeline's route after encountering challenging drilling conditions in a mountainous area between Hope and Chilliwack, British Columbia.
The CER denied the request on Dec. 5, later saying that the application did not adequately address concerns about pipeline integrity and the environment. Trans Mountain then asked the regulator to reverse that decision on Dec. 14, warning of a possibly "catastrophic" two-year delay and billions of dollars in losses.
The CER has not yet made a decision.
The pipeline can enter service within one month of mechanical completion, which precedes line fill, Trans Mountain said in the filing.
Canadian heavy oil prices strengthened as the filing suggested Trans Mountain and the regulator are working hard to resolve construction problems, a trader said.
In Trans Mountain's 33-page filing, it told the CER it had considered numerous alternatives before settling on the revised plan for which it is seeking approval.
The company said it has faced growing problems with water flow and abnormal wear on tools as it drills into hard rock.
Under the worst-case scenario for the plan currently approved by CER, the company's horizontal directional drilling approach could fail and require a fresh alternative that may delay the project by two years to 30 months, Trans Mountain said.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's Liberal government bought the project in 2018 to ensure the expansion went ahead, but costs have ballooned to CA$30.9 billion (US$23.14 billion), more than four times the original budget.
Recommended Reading
Exxon CEO Darren Woods: Hydrogen Incentives ‘Critical’ for Now
2025-02-03 - Exxon Mobil CEO Darren Woods said the end goal for energy policy should be a system in which no fuel source remains dependent on government subsidies.
Big Spenders: EPA Touts Billions in Clean Energy Spending
2025-01-15 - Nearly $69 billion in funding from the Inflation Reduction Act and Bipartisan Infrastructure Law has been dispersed by the Environmental Protection Agency in its clean energy push.
Congress Kills Biden Era Methane Fee on Oil, Gas Producers
2025-02-28 - The methane fee was mandated by the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, which directed the EPA to set a charge on methane emissions for facilities that emit more than 25,000 tons per year of CO2e.
Report: Trump to Declare 'National Energy Emergency'
2025-01-20 - President-elect Donald Trump will also sign an executive order focused on Alaska, an incoming White House official said.
Industry Players Get Laser Focused on Emissions Reduction
2025-01-16 - Faced with progressively stringent requirements, companies are seeking methane monitoring technologies that make compliance easier.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.