Deutsche Bank on March 2 tightened its coal financing policies but has yet to change its criteria for the oil and gas industries, drawing criticism from climate activists.
Germany's largest lender said it would not take as new clients corporations that generate more than 30% of revenue from coal and do not provide a "credible diversification plan", a figure more in line with industry standards and down from a previous 50%.
The bank said it does not provide project financing for thermal coal.
Deutsche said it "plans to update its oil and gas policy" without giving a timeframe.
"Coal is a dying industry anyway so it's not surprising banks find it in themselves to distance themselves from coal," Kate Cahoon, a campaigner with activist 350.org, said ahead of the announcement. "We are really interested in seeing stronger commitments around oil and in particular gas."
Deutsche Bank in recent years has marketed itself as a lender that firms can turn to as they transition to a greener future, a strategy it views as central to its own turnaround and boosting profits.
Climate activists fear that the financial industry enables industries such coal and oil to carry on polluting, and said Deutsche Bank in particular has not done enough.
In February a group of investors managing assets worth more than $1.5 trillion wrote to the bank urging it to stop directly financing new oil and gas fields this year.
The bank has previously faced pressure from Amundi and Nordea Asset Management to tighten its coal policy.
Deutsche said its financing of the oil and gas sector declined by more than 20% last year, which it attributed to the bank's exit from Russia and its cessation of support for Russian gas companies rather than an active decision to stop financing certain providers.
This corresponded with a 28.9% fall in the carbon emissions associated with the bank's lending to the oil and gas sector, though this was partly a consequence of rising share prices, meaning that Deutsche's overall share of financing and emissions fell.
The International Energy Agency said in 2021 that investment in new oil, gas and coal supply projects must be halted to achieve net-zero emissions by the middle of the century.
Recommended Reading
Shale Outlook Eagle Ford: Sustaining the Long Plateau in South Texas
2025-01-08 - The Eagle Ford lacks the growth profile of the Permian Basin, but thoughtful M&A and refrac projects are extending operator inventories.
Permian to Drive Output Growth as Other Basins Flatten, Decline–EIA
2025-01-14 - Lower 48 oil production from outside the Permian Basin—namely, the Bakken and Eagle Ford shales—is expected to flatten and decline in coming years, per new EIA forecasts.
Shale Outlook Uinta: Horizontal Boom to Continue in 2025
2025-01-11 - After two large-scale transactions by SM Energy and Ovintiv, the Uinta Basin is ready for development—and stacked pay exploration.
Harold Hamm: ‘Drill, Baby, Drill’ Faces Geology Barriers, Even Under Trump
2024-11-18 - Harold Hamm, Continental Resources founder and major Trump donor, says the U.S. faces real barriers to expanding production growth—even with Republicans controlling D.C.—as major shale basins mature.
PRB’s Sage Butte Ready for M&A Across Lower 48, Maybe Canada Too
2025-01-08 - Private E&P Sage Butte Energy, which operates in the Powder River Basin, is less interested in the Permian Basin, citing the cost of entry.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.