Although price differentials between Canadian crude and that of other markets hasn’t curtailed investment, it may be moving midstream companies toward pipelines that head out to tidewater locations instead of inland, experts say.
Steve Wuori, strategic advisor in the chief executive office at Canada’s Enbridge Inc., highlighted the impact of lacking infrastructure on pricing during the panel, “Pipes, Trains and Barges: The Transformation of North American Oil Logistics,” featured during IHS CERAWeek 2014 in Houston.
“Canada is a country that consumes a million and a half barrels (bbl.) of oil a day. It produces twice that. And then it
imports another 700,000 bbl. of oil a day, so if you do the math, that means 2.2 million bbl. a day must be exported from Canada every day,” he explained. “And that puts a real challenge on pricing for Canadian production.”
Pipelines used to flow from tidewater into inland destinations, and that has changed as companies look for ways to tighten pricing differentials. Wuori said that last year, Canadian crude traded at various times from $8 to $40 bbl. less than West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude.
“That’s a huge variation,” he said. “The whole goal is to get to tidewater, somewhere where you can get a better price
than the landlocked price inland.”
While the differentials create winners and losers, he said, it hasn’t disheartened investors. “There is a confidence those differentials will become manageable or predictable,” he said, noting that several major pipeline projects to move crude to east and west coasts are under construction or in the permitting process.
“Part of what pipeline projects are designed to do is to help stabilize, not eliminate, that differential,” he explained.
Wuori said there is a lot of enthusiasm for getting crude to ports on the East and West Coasts, based in part on the “frustration over what it takes to go north and south, highlighted by Keystone XL and the many years it’s taken to resolve.”
He added that when one considers the chronic discount to Canadian crude, “there absolutely is a will to get to the coast, in particular, the West Coast. The Asian market is one that we think should be targeted, especially for heavy oil.”
The notion that heavy Canadian crude from Alberta would go to Asian markets where emissions restrictions are less than those in the U.S. is one point supporters of the Keystone XL pipeline have often mentioned.
Recommended Reading
As Permian Targets Grow Scarce, 3Q M&A Drops to $12B—Enverus
2024-10-16 - Upstream M&A activity fell sharply in the third quarter as public consolidation slowed and Permian Basin targets dwindled, according to Enverus Intelligence Research.
After M&A, Some ‘Stingy’ E&Ps Plan to Hold Operated Shale Inventory
2024-10-10 - After a whirlwind run of upstream consolidation, experts anticipated a wave of portfolio rationalization and divestitures. But with high-quality drilling locations already scarce, E&Ps may cling to operated inventory.
Great Expectations Continue to Round Out a Big Year in A&D
2024-10-17 - At least $1.8 billion in A&D transactions have taken place already in 2024.
Tailwater Buys Interests Across 5,000 Acres in Permian Core
2024-10-02 - Tailwater E&P's purchase of non-op working interests from Accelerate Resources includes future inventory held by Diamondback, EOG Resources, Devon and several other E&Ps.
APA Divests $950 Million in Non-core Permian Basin Assets
2024-09-13 - APA Corp. said it would sell assets in the Central Basin Platform, Texas and New Mexico Shelf and Northwest Shelf that average 21,000 boe/d, 57% oil.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.