Energy Transfer first filed suit against Greenpeace USA and Greenpeace International in federal court in 2017. (Source: Shutterstock)
Energy Transfer won its defamation suit against environmental group Greenpeace on March 19, with a North Dakota jury awarding the midstream company more than $660 million in damages.
Energy Transfer first filed suit against Greenpeace USA and Greenpeace International in federal court in 2017. When it was thrown out, the company filed again in state court in 2019. Energy Transfer claimed $300 million in damages from Greenpeace’s involvement in the 2016 protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline in the Bakken Shale.
Indigenous groups had led an opposition movement over the pipeline’s proximity to the Standing Rock Indian Reservation.
Greenpeace maintains its actions at Standing Rock were peaceful, claiming that the lawsuit leveled against them was an attack on the First Amendment’s right to free speech and
a SLAPP, or strategic lawsuit against public participation, meant to force an organization into expensive litigation.
Before the ruling, Greenpeace said the case had the potential to “establish dangerous new legal precedents that could hold any participant at protests responsible for the actions of others at those protests.”
Energy Transfer shot back. In a statement released in July 2024, Energy Transfer said its lawsuit was “not about free speech as they are trying to claim.
“It is about them not following the law. We support the rights of all Americans to express their opinions and lawfully protest. However, when it is not done in accordance with our laws, we have a legal system to deal with that. Beyond that we will let our case speak for itself in February.”
The trial began on Feb. 25 and lasted three weeks. Greenpeace said it would appeal the jury’s decision.
The environmental group also has its own lawsuit against Energy Transfer pending in Holland. The lawsuit accuses the company of filing meritless claims against Greenpeace and seeks to recover damages from Energy Transfer’s legal actions against the group.
Recommended Reading
EnLink Investors Vote in Favor of ONEOK Buyout
2025-01-30 - Holders of EnLink units voted in favor of ONEOK’s $4.3 billion acquisition of the stock, ONEOK announced Jan. 30.
Mach Prices Common Units, Closes Flycatcher Deal
2025-02-06 - Mach Natural Resources priced a public offering of common units following the close of $29.8 million of assets near its current holdings in the Ardmore Basin on Jan. 31.
The Private Equity Puzzle: Rebuilding Portfolios After M&A Craze
2025-01-28 - In the Haynesville, Delaware and Utica, Post Oak Energy Capital is supporting companies determined to make a profitable footprint.
Viper to Buy Diamondback Mineral, Royalty Interests in $4.45B Drop-Down
2025-01-30 - Working to reduce debt after a $26 billion acquisition of Endeavor Energy Resources, Diamondback will drop down $4.45 billion in mineral and royalty interests to its subsidiary Viper Energy.
EON Deal Adds Permian Interests, Restructures Balance Sheet
2025-02-11 - EON Resources Inc. will acquire Permian overriding royalty interests in a cash-and-equity deal with Pogo Royalty LLC, which has agreed to reduce certain liabilities and obligations owed to it by EON.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.