[Editor's note: A version of this story appears in the December 2019 edition of Oil and Gas Investor. Subscribe to the magazine here.]
With tens of thousands of locations populating the well inventory for E&Ps, it seems at first glance to be a little early discussing EOR in shale.
However, a program to inject natural gas in the volatile oil window of the Eagle Ford demonstrates that cyclic gas injection (CGI) or, as more colloquially known, huff and puff, has moved beyond the experimental stage and is a proven method to economically increase incremental oil recovery in shale.
Furthermore, the Eagle Ford process is undergoing experiments in both the Denver-Julesburg Basin and the Bakken Shale. The big prize, of course, is the Permian Basin, where excess natural gas earns zero revenue and is flared away, creating economic waste and bad optics for the industry just as environmental, social and governance is becoming a major issue in interactions with the public.
EOR has been overlooked as a source of new tight formation oil in an era dominated by hydraulic fracturing. However, EOR doubled Permian Basin production from conventional fields during the past 100 years. Early efforts involved re-injecting field gas into San Andres oil fields. During ensuing decades, the Permian witnessed significant efforts involving waterfloods. By the 1970s, EOR evolved to carbon-dioxide miscible floods which have sustained conventional mega-fields for decades in the Horseshoe Atoll, the legendary Yates Field, and in multiple San Andres plays along the Central Basin Platform. Cumulative yield is measured in billions of barrels.
Yet, shale plays, the latest iteration in 160 years of American oil production, have unfolded with little interest in secondary or EOR other than attempts to refracture wells that were stimulated with earlier generation completion techniques.
Tight formation oil plays currently yield 6% to 9% of original oil in place. Considering EOR moved Permian Basin conventional oil recovery from 18% to 20% up to 40%, maybe contemplating methods to extend the life of tight formation plays decades into the future is time well spent.
To date, six operators have employed cyclic gas injection on 30 well pads across the Eagle Ford. The most active of these, EOG Resources Inc., has not formally shared results with the industry. However, Houston-based engineering firm Shale IOR LLC conducted detailed detective and engineering work on Eagle Ford EOR and presented findings during the September 2019 DUG Eagle Ford conference in San Antonio.
Using public data sources, coupled with field work and enhanced via reservoir simulation models, Shale IOR determined cyclic gas injection efforts in the Eagle Ford volatile oil window deliver consistent, robust results with average first cycle EOR adding 200 barrels per day per well and an increased incremental oil recovery between 80% and 100% during a 10-year project life.
Shale IOR’s review of six years of EOR effort in the Eagle Ford found at the simplest level that new oil production volume is proportional to gas injection volume on a cycle that includes 30 to 40 days of injection followed by 30 days of harvest. This response is predictable, consistent and immediate, unlike the lagged production increase found in conventional EOR projects.
This is a repressuring process and not a displacement process as is found on miscible gas floods. If an operator reaches target pressure on the very first gas injection cycle, it is possible to generate a 100% increase in incremental oil.
In the Eagle Ford, the process involves capital spending of about $1 million per well for compressors and infrastructure and additional spending to purchase natural gas. In the end, purchased gas is zeroed out by gas sold in the future, but it can entail an upfront cost of $12- to $18 million before the yield turns cash-flow positive.
The Permian Basin is a natural laboratory for expanding the experiment in tight formation EOR and also adds the potential of finding ways to incorporate CO2 technology for enhanced recovery in tight formation plays. Short term, a Permian operator that can recycle its own gas and has its own processing capability can achieve robust economics via the CGI methodology. Additionally, there was an unexpected side benefit discovered in the Eagle Ford. Repressurizing primary wells (parent wells) for enhanced recovery can alleviate future well interference issues and address the increasingly vexatious parent/child well phenomenon.
Stay tuned.
Recommended Reading
Water Management Called ‘Massive Headwind’ for Permian Operators
2024-11-21 - Amanda Brock, CEO of Aris Water Solutions, says multiple answers will be needed to solve the growing amounts of produced water generated by fracking.
Coterra Takes Harkey Sand ‘Row’ Show on the Road
2024-11-20 - With success to date in Harkey sandstone overlying the Wolfcamp, the company aims to make mega-DSUs in New Mexico with the 49,000-net-acre bolt-on of adjacent sections.
Suriname's Staatsolie Says Exxon has Withdrawn from Offshore Block
2024-11-20 - Suriname's state-run oil company Staatsolie said on Nov. 20 that U.S. oil giant Exxon Mobil has withdrawn from its offshore block 52, and block operator Petronas Suriname E&P will take over its 50% stake.
E&P Highlights: Nov. 18, 2024
2024-11-18 - Here’s a roundup of the latest E&P headlines, including new discoveries in the North Sea and governmental appointments.
Norway's Massive Johan Sverdrup Oilfield Shut by Power Outage
2024-11-18 - Norway's Equinor has halted output from its Johan Sverdrup oilfield, western Europe's largest, due to an onshore power outage, the company said on Nov. 18.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.