
Although this quick look doesn’t tell the whole story, it stands to reason that the market’s attraction to larger E&P companies may lead to additional consolidation in the upstream space. (Source: Hart Energy / Shutterstock.com)
Over the last couple of years at least, we’ve observed a consistent premium awarded to larger upstream companies. Now that many companies have reported their 2020 results, we thought we’d take a fresh look.
Our sample doesn’t include every upstream name, and there are unfortunately quite a few names that we’ve looked at previously that are no longer publicly traded. Some went through bankruptcy and are now private; others merged with another company. Our sample for this review includes 53 companies that have total enterprise value (TEV) between $300 million and $600 billion. For our purposes, we’ve defined “small cap” companies as those with TEV less than $500 million, “mid-cap” up to $10 billion, and “large-cap” as those with greater values.
The chart below compares 2020 EBITDA multiples (TEV/EBITDA) versus TEV; note that the x-axis is a log scale. We continue to see a meaningful relationship between EBITDA multiples and company size. We also note that the EBITDA multiples are higher than we’ve typically seen; we attribute this to low 2020 EBITDA values caused by the pandemic-related collapse in commodity prices. Companies are now valued on a price outlook that’s much better than last year’s outlook.


When we look at the average multiple for our three company sizes (above), the size premium becomes clearer.
Although this quick look doesn’t tell the whole story, it stands to reason that the market’s attraction to larger E&P companies may lead to additional consolidation in the upstream space, particularly where companies scale up from the mid-cap (less than $10 billion) to the large-cap size.
About the Author:
Steve Hendrickson is the president of Ralph E. Davis Associates, an Opportune LLP company. Hendrickson has over 30 years of professional leadership experience in the energy industry with a proven track record of adding value through acquisitions, development and operations. In addition, he possesses extensive knowledge of petroleum economics, energy finance, reserves reporting and data management, and has deep expertise in reservoir engineering, production engineering and technical evaluations. Hendrickson is a licensed professional engineer in the state of Texas and holds an M.S. in Finance from the University of Houston and a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin. He currently serves as a board member of the Society of Petroleum Evaluation Engineers and is a registered FINRA representative.
Recommended Reading
Blackstone Buys NatGas Plant in ‘Data Center Valley’ for $1B
2025-01-24 - Ares Management’s Potomac Energy Center, sited in Virginia near more than 130 data centers, is expected to see “significant further growth,” Blackstone Energy Transition Partners said.
Cummins, Liberty Energy to Deploy New Engine for Fracking Platform This Year
2025-01-29 - Liberty Energy Inc. and Cummins Inc. are deploying the natural gas large displacement engine developed in a partnership formed in 2024.
SM Energy Marries Wildcatting and Analytics in the Oil Patch
2025-04-01 - As E&P SM Energy explores in Texas and Utah, Herb Vogel’s approach is far from a Hail Mary.
E&P Highlights: Feb. 3, 2025
2025-02-03 - Here’s a roundup of the latest E&P headlines, from a forecast of rising global land rig activity to new contracts.
Watch for Falling Gas DUCs: E&Ps Resume Completions at $4 Gas
2025-01-23 - Drilled but uncompleted (DUC) gas wells that totaled some 500 into September 2024 have declined to just under 400, according to a J.P. Morgan Securities analysis of Enverus data.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.