
Williams Cos. produces about 1.7 billion pounds of ethylene annually at its Geismar, La., facility. (Source: The Williams Cos. Inc.)
Energy Transfer Equity LP (NYSE: ETE) officially killed its merger with Williams Cos. Inc. (NYSE: WMB) on June 29, though whether the issue remains dead is in doubt and up to the courts to decide.
“Williams recognizes the practical fact that ETE has refused to close the merger,” the company said in a statement responding to Energy Transfer’s decision, adding that “it is in the best interests of its stockholders to seek, among other remedies, monetary damages from ETE for its breaches.”
Williams filed an appeal with the Delaware Supreme Court on June 27, asking it to overturn the Delaware Court of Chancery’s June 24 ruling that allowed Energy Transfer to back out of the deal.
When announced in September 2015, the merger was valued at $38 billion and would have created a 100,000-mile network of pipelines. Since that time, the oil and gas industry’s downturn cut billions of dollars of value from both entities.
In early May, Energy Transfer disclosed that its law firm, Latham & Watkins LLP, could not issue a “721 opinion” concluding that a transfer of Williams assets into Energy Transfer Partners LP (NYSE: ETP) following the merger would be tax-free. The tax-free status was part of the merger agreement, as was the choice of Latham to make that determination.
Energy Transfer’s Chairman and CEO Kelcy Warren removed any doubt about the deal’s status during a May 5 earnings call with analysts.
“We can’t close,” he said. “We don’t have a transaction that can close. So I want to be very clear, we can’t close this transaction. We have a merger agreement. We have obligations under that merger agreement. We take that very seriously. We intend to honor all of our commitments under the merger agreement, but we can’t close this deal. We don’t have a deal that’s closeable.”
Williams responded with a lawsuit charging that Energy Transfer failed to attempt to satisfy the conditions of closing, including delivery of the tax opinion. The Chancery Court ruled on June 24 that Energy Transfer was entitled to walk away from the agreement if the opinion could not be delivered by June 28.
On June 27, Williams shareholders voted to approve the merger. The company has stated failure to complete the merger could cost investors between $4 billion and $10 billion.
Wall Street has considered this deal dead for about two months and has valued the two companies as individual entities in trading.
Joseph Markman can be reached at jmarkman@hartenergy.com and @JHMarkman.
Recommended Reading
Baker Hughes Appoints Ahmed Moghal to CFO
2025-02-24 - Ahmed Moghal is taking over as CFO of Baker Hughes following Nancy Buese’s departure from the position.
Chevron Targets Up to $8B in Free Cash Flow Growth Next Year, CEO Says
2025-01-08 - The No. 2 U.S. oil producer expects results to benefit from the start of new or expanded oil production projects in Kazakhstan, U.S. shale and the offshore U.S. Gulf of Mexico.
Murphy Shares Drop on 4Q Miss, but ’25 Plans Show Promise
2025-02-02 - Murphy Oil’s fourth-quarter 2024 output missed analysts’ expectations, but analysts see upside with a robust Eagle Ford Shale drilling program and the international E&P’s discovery offshore Vietnam.
Baker Hughes Wins Contracts for Woodside’s Louisiana LNG Project
2024-12-30 - Bechtel has ordered gas technology equipment from Baker Hughes for the first phase of Woodside Energy Group’s Louisiana LNG development.
Argent LNG, Baker Hughes Sign Agreement for Louisiana Project
2025-02-03 - Baker Hughes will provide infrastructure for Argent LNG’s 24 mtpa Louisiana project, which is slated to start construction in 2026.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.