EU governments tentatively agreed on Dec. 1 on a $60/bbl price cap on Russian seaborne oil—an idea of the Group of Seven (G7) nations—with an adjustment mechanism to keep the cap at 5% below the market price, according to diplomats and a document seen by Reuters.
The agreement still needs approval from all EU governments in a written procedure by Dec. 2. Poland, which had pushed for the cap to be as low as possible, had as of the evening of Dec. 1 not confirmed if it would support the deal, an EU diplomat said.
EU countries have wrangled for days over the details of the price cap, which aims to slash Russia’s income from selling oil, while preventing a spike in global oil prices after an EU embargo on Russian crude takes effect on Dec. 5.
It will allow countries to continue importing Russian crude oil using Western insurance and maritime services as long as they do not pay more per barrel than the agreed limit.
The initial G7 proposal last week was for a price cap of $65/bbl-$70/bbl with no adjustment mechanism.
A senior G7 official said a deal was “very, very close” and should be finalized in the coming days and by Dec. 5 at the latest. The official expressed confidence that the price cap would limit Russia’s ability to fight its war against Ukraine.
G7 officials had been closely monitoring oil markets during the development of the price cap mechanism and seemed “pretty comfortable” with it, the official said.
Earlier, U.S. Deputy Treasury Secretary Wally Adeyemo told the Reuters NEXTconference in New York that the
$60 cap was within the range of the bloc’s discussions and would limit Russian revenues.
Since Russian Urals crude URL-E already traded lower, Poland, Lithuania and Estonia rejected the higher $65/bbl-$70/bbl price as not achieving the main objective of reducing Moscow’s ability to finance its war in Ukraine.
“The price cap is set at $60 with a provision to keep it 5% below market price for Russian crude, based on IEA figures,” an EU diplomat said.
Regular Reviews
An EU document seen by Reuters showed the price cap would be reviewed in mid-January and every two months after that, to assess how the scheme is functioning and respond to possible “turbulences” in the oil market that occur as a result.
The document said a 45-day “transitional period” would apply to vessels carrying Russian-origin crude oil that was loaded before Dec. 5 and unloaded at its final destination by Jan. 19, 2023.
Russian Urals crude had traded at around $70/bbl the afternoon of Dec. 1.
The G7 price cap on Russian seaborne crude oil is to kick in on Dec. 5, replacing the harsher EU outright ban on buying Russian seaborne crude, as a way to safeguard global oil supply because Russia produces 10% of the world's oil.
The idea to enforce the G7 cap is to prohibit shipping, insurance and re-insurance companies from handling cargoes of Russian crude around the globe, unless it is sold for less than the price set by the G7 and its allies.
Because the world’s key shipping and insurance firms are based in G7 countries, the price cap would make it very difficult for Moscow to sell its oil for a higher price.
The G7 official expressed optimism that the bloc would also reach agreement on a price cap and exemptions for Russian refined oil products ahead of Feb. 5, when an EU ban barring such imports takes effect.
Recommended Reading
Matterhorn Express, Partially Online, to Ease Permian Gas Bloat
2024-09-05 - The long-awaited Matterhorn Express pipeline is shipping small amounts of natural gas out of the Permian Basin, according to an E&P CEO.
Midstream Players Awaiting the Merge Surge
2024-09-27 - Midstream growth prospects limit funding at the moment, but the coming consolidation should shake things up.
Midstream Majors Enjoy a Healthy M&A Market, For Now
2024-09-24 - The latest era of midstream consolidation has shrunk the pool of independents, but the number is still historically high.
As Midstream Wobbles on IRA and ESG, a New Trend Opens Up for Sector
2024-10-08 - Enthusiasm for the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and ESG in the midstream sector is waning. Players are turning to a new trend—asset-backed securitization.
Uinta Railroad Up for Review as Supreme Court Term Begins
2024-10-03 - Court analysts say a decision on the proposed Uinta Basin railway, coming next year, could have a major impact on the energy industry.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.