The Federal Energy Regulatory approved plans for two pipeline projects will bring natural gas to future power plants and the Gulf Coast. (Source: Shutterstock)
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission voted in favor of two natural gas pipeline projects on Jan. 18, including a line that will support future power plant operations for the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), while the other allows Williams Cos. to expand capacity on its Transcontinental line.
The TVA needs a 32-mile natural gas pipeline to supply a planned power facility in Stewart County, Tennessee. The authority plans to replace the coal-powered Cumberland plant with two units. The first, a 1,450-MW unit, will go into operation by 2026, the second in 2026. The TVA had warned the FERC in a letter sent Jan. 3 that disapproval of the gas line would lead to keeping the Cumberland facility open past its planned retirement date.
Kinder Morgan subsidiary Tennessee Gas Pipeline is slated to build the project.
The Transcontinental line extends from Texas to New York. Williams plans to add 364,400 dekatherms per day of natural gas capacity for a portion of the line in Louisiana and Texas, according to the company’s filing with the FERC. The company has estimated the cost of the expansion at $91.8 million. The expansion “will support reliability and diversification of energy infrastructure along the Gulf Coast,” according to a statement on the company’s web site.
EOG Resources entered into a 15-year binding precedent agreement for all new capacity the project produces, according to Williams.
Both projects received protests from environmental groups.
The Southern Environmental Law Center, a legal advocacy organization based in the Southeast U.S., has filed two federal lawsuits against the TVA’s plan—a case against the pipeline’s permit and a case saying the TVA failed to study alternatives to gas-powered plants before moving forward.
The TVA said a delay would hurt the organization’s “ability to develop and implement a path to approximately 80% carbon reduction by 2035,” according to its filing with the FERC.
The Sierra Club has expressed opposition to the Williams project, filing a protest with the FERC in 2021, and has maintained in other comments filed with the commission that the project does not take into account the public’s interest against carbon emissions.
During the FERC’s Jan. 17 open session, FERC Commissioner Allison Clements repeated that the project did not prove that it would benefit the public and voted against approval.
FERC Chairman Willie Phillips said Williams’ contract with EOG proved that the project was needed and voted in favor, along with FERC Commissioner Mark Christie.
Recommended Reading
Buying Time: Continuation Funds Easing Private Equity Exits
2025-01-31 - An emerging option to extend portfolio company deadlines is gaining momentum, eclipsing go-public strategies or M&A.
Utica Oil’s Infinity IPO Values its Play at $48,000 per Boe/d
2025-01-30 - Private-equity-backed Infinity Natural Resources’ IPO pricing on Jan. 30 gives a first look into market valuation for Ohio’s new tight-oil Utica play. Public trading is to begin the morning of Jan. 31.
HNO International Enters $10MM Hydrogen Offtake Agreement
2025-01-30 - HNO International has agreed to supply hydrogen to a Texas-based company from its 1.25-megawatt hydrogen platform.
Baker Hughes Wins LNG Technology Orders for Venture Global
2025-01-30 - Baker Hughes Co. also signed a multiyear services agreement to support the first two phases of Venture Global’s Plaquemines LNG project in Louisiana.
EnLink Investors Vote in Favor of ONEOK Buyout
2025-01-30 - Holders of EnLink units voted in favor of ONEOK’s $4.3 billion acquisition of the stock, ONEOK announced Jan. 30.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.