Martin Resource Management plans to buy MMLP, which was split off as a public company from privately held MRMC in 2002, for $4.02 per common unit. (Source: Shutterstock)
A group of shareholders is publicly opposing the proposed $132 million merger between Martin Midstream Partners (MMLP) and privately held Martin Resource Management (MRMC), which is scheduled for a shareholder vote on Dec. 30.
Martin Resource Management plans to buy MMLP, which was split off as a public company from privately held MRMC in 2002, for $4.02 per common unit.
Nut Tree Capital Management and Caspian Capital claim to represent about 13.6% of outstanding shares of MMLP, according to a Dec. 2 press release. In a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the firms accused MRMC of proposing an insider deal that undervalues the cost of the shares.
“Using a multiple of 9.0x 2024 EBITDA … would imply that MMLP is worth over $15.40 per common unit, more than 280% over the merger price,” the firms said in the letter.
The conflict goes back to the original merger announcement in May. New York- based Nut Tree and Caspian started an unsuccessful takeover bid for the midstream company after Martin Resource originally offered $3.05 per unit. The companies countered with a $4 per unit offer.
In October, Martin Resource countered with a $4.02 per unit offer and said the deal would move to a shareholder vote.
MRMC said the price delivers a 34% shareholder premium to the market closing price before its initial proposal on May 24.
MRMC said in its statement that the proposal has gone through the typical, extensive vetting process required before a merger can go forward.
“The Conflicts Committee of the Board of Directors of the General Partner, which consists of three independent directors, conducted a thorough, nine-month evaluation with the support of independent legal and financial advisors and was diligent about considering the best path forward for MMLP,” said Bob Bondurant, president and CEO of Martin Midstream Partners in the press release.
“The Conflicts Committee unanimously and in good faith determined that the pending merger is fair and reasonable to, and in the best interests of, MMLP and the unaffiliated holders of MMLP common units,” Bondurant said.
Recommended Reading
DC Circuit Denies Rehearing for Williams’ Mid-Atlantic Project
2025-01-23 - Williams Cos.’ Regional Energy Access will continue operating as the midstream company seeks an emergency FERC certificate to keep supplying natural gas to Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Maryland.
Analysts: NatGas Price Will Drive Next Appalachian Pipeline
2024-11-13 - Infrastructure development in the Appalachia region could also benefit from greater legislative certainty.
Midstreamers Say Need for More Permian NatGas Pipelines Inevitable
2024-11-26 - The Permian Basin’s associated gas output could outstrip the region’s planned capacity well before the end of the decade, pipeline company executives said.
Glenfarne Signs on to Develop Alaska LNG Project
2025-01-09 - Glenfarne has signed a deal with a state-owned Alaskan corporation to develop a natural gas pipeline and facilities for export and utility purposes.
Kinder Morgan Reaches FID for $1.4B Mississippi NatGas Pipeline
2024-12-19 - Kinder Morgan plans to keep boosting its capacity to the Southeast and is moving forward with a 206-mile pipeline with an initial capacity of 1.5 Bcf/d.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.