Climate activists at Greenpeace plan to mount a legal challenge against the British authorities allowing Shell Plc to develop the Jackdaw North Sea gas field, after a similar case against a BP field was initially rejected by a court.
The future of oil and gas fields such as Jackdaw has become a lightning rod for climate activists who are increasingly taking to the courts to challenge lawmakers on their pledges to turn Britain into a net zero carbon economy by 2050.
Last week, a court asked the government to revise its climate strategy and present a more detailed plan to lawmakers on how to achieve net zero after climate activists brought a case.
The government says Britain, whose oil and gas reserves are exploited by firms such as Shell rather than a national oil company, needs to boost domestic production, which is in decline, to shore up energy security.
Shell made a final investment decision on July 25 to develop Jackdaw, which is expected to come onstream in the mid-2020s and could provide 6% of U.K. gas output.
Authorities initially rejected Shell’s plans on environmental grounds but gave the green light after Shell changed the way the project would deal with operational emissions.
Greenpeace says the government is wrong to take operational emissions only into account when granting permission to extract fossil fuels.
It argues planet-warming gases produced from the burning of the fuels, typically a much bigger amount than operational emissions, should also be reflected in any decision.
“Meanwhile, household bills are soaring, and the government is ignoring common sense–like home insulation, heat pumps and cheap renewable power,” Greenpeace said.
A similar case brought by Greenpeace over BP Plc’s Vorlich oil field was initially rejected by a Scottish court, but Greenpeace has appealed this at the Supreme Court.
“We are aware of Greenpeace’s legal challenge against the U.K. regulator in relation to the Jackdaw consent decision,” a Shell spokesperson said. “The court will decide in due course on whether this challenge is allowed to proceed... we are progressing the project.”
Recommended Reading
Formentera Joins EOG in Wildcatting South Texas’ Oily Pearsall Pay
2025-01-22 - Known in the past as a “heartbreak shale,” Formentera Partners is counting on bigger completions and longer laterals to crack the Pearsall code, Managing Partner Bryan Sheffield said. EOG Resources is also exploring the shale.
Hibernia IV Joins Dawson Dean Wildcatting Alongside EOG, SM, Birch
2025-01-30 - Hibernia IV is among a handful of wildcatters—including EOG Resources, SM Energy and Birch Resources—exploring the Dean sandstone near the Dawson-Martin county line, state records show.
Shale Outlook: E&Ps Making More U-Turn Laterals, Problem-Free
2025-01-09 - Of the more than 70 horseshoe wells drilled to date, half came in the first nine months of 2024 as operators found 2-mile, single-section laterals more economic than a pair of 1-mile straight holes.
Classic Rock, New Wells: Permian Conventional Zones Gain Momentum
2024-12-02 - Spurned or simply ignored by the big publics, the Permian Basin’s conventional zones—the Central Basin Platform, Northwest Shelf and Eastern Shelf—remain playgrounds for independent producers.
Analysis: Middle Three Forks Bench Holds Vast Untapped Oil Potential
2025-01-07 - Williston Basin operators have mostly landed laterals in the shallower upper Three Forks bench. But the deeper middle Three Forks contains hundreds of millions of barrels of oil yet to be recovered, North Dakota state researchers report.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.