Greenpeace and other environmental campaigners have launched legal challenges against the European Commission over its decision to include natural gas and nuclear energy in the EU’s list of “green” investments.
They argue the EU violated its own climate laws by doing this, citing the greenhouse-gas emissions produced by gas power plants, and say the move risks diverting investments into fossil fuels instead of renewable energy.
Greenpeace said it had requested an internal review of the Commission’s decision to label gas and nuclear energy as green. Four other environmental groups—WWF, Friends of the Earth Germany, Transport & Environment and ClientEarth—focused on gas.
The Commission said it would reply to the requests in due course.
In focus is the EU’s ‘taxonomy,’ a rulebook defining which investments can be labeled climate-friendly and designed to guide investors towards green projects that will help deliver the bloc’s emissions-cutting targets.
The Commission has until February to respond. If the Commission does not withdraw the rules, the groups said they would take their challenges to the European Court of Justice.
“Gas is a leading cause of climate and economic chaos, while there is still no solution to the problem of nuclear radioactive waste and the risk of nuclear accidents is far too significant to ignore,” Greenpeace campaigner Ariadna Rodrigo said.
The Commission had excluded gas power plants from its original taxonomy proposal, but added them later, amid a fierce political debate among EU countries—who disagree on whether the fuel deserves a 'green' label.
Brussels said it had added “strict conditions” to the final rules for gas plants, including an emissions limit and a requirement to switch to low-carbon gases by 2035.
Representatives from five non-profit groups quit their roles advising the Commission on the taxonomy last week, citing the EU’s handling of the gas and nuclear rules.
Separately, Luxembourg and Austria, which both oppose nuclear power and have warned against labelling gas as green, are preparing a legal challenge to the EU rules.
Recommended Reading
Permian M&A: Oxy Shops Delaware Assets, Family Oil Cos. Stand Out
2024-05-10 - As operators scour the Permian Basin for M&A opportunities, they’re keeping an eye on a tepid divestiture market. Family-owned oil companies also stand out among the pack of private inventory holders remaining in the Permian, according to Enverus Intelligence Research.
Permian Pulse: Franklin Mountain Stands Out Among Delaware M&A Targets
2024-06-04 - Franklin Mountain was a relative nobody when the company bid for Delaware Basin acreage in a 2018 BLM auction. Today, it’s one of the largest private U.S. oil producers and a major target for acquisition.
Watching the Uinta: XCL Petitions the FTC to Approve Altamont Acquisition
2024-06-25 - XCL Resources' petition was required under a prior agreement EnCap Energy Capital Fund XI struck with the FTC in 2022, which required the private equity group to sell off EP Energy’s Utah oil business.
Could Crescent, SilverBow Buy More in South Texas After $2.1B Deal?
2024-05-17 - The combination of Crescent Energy and SilverBow Resources will yield one of the Eagle Ford’s top producers—and the pro forma E&P could look to gobble up more acreage in South Texas after closing.
The Shape of M&A to Come: Is Devon Up Next to Join the Spree?
2024-05-31 - ConocoPhillips' recent $17.1 billion deal to acquire Marathon Oil came after the company missed out on buying CrownRock and Endeavor, two companies Devon Energy took a hard look at, Moelis’ Stephen Trauber said.