With more than $370 trillion of global financial contracts referencing LIBOR (London Inter-bank Offered Rate), many oil and gas companies are curious about how the phase-out of LIBOR by 2021 could impact their organization. Many companies are beginning to ask how this transition will impact their organization and what steps can be taken now.
Why is LIBOR being phased out?
LIBOR has been the default local and international benchmark interest rate for a diverse range of financial products for decades. The rate is based on various banks’ proprietary observations rather than robust market transactions. This has left the rate vulnerable to manipulation and major rate-fixing scandals came to light starting in 2007. As a result, the U.K.’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) decided that it will no longer compel banks to submit LIBOR estimates by the end of 2021.
What is the transition plan?
As a response to the issue in the U.S., the U.S. Federal Reserve Board (the “Fed”) convened the Alternative Reference Rates Committee (ARRC) in 2014 to establish a viable alternative to the U.S. dollar LIBOR. The ARRC determined in 2017 that the overnight indexed swap (OIS) rate based on the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR), a broad treasury repurchase agreement financing rate used when banks borrow or loan treasuries overnight, would be its preferred alternative reference rate. Accordingly, the Fed began publishing the SOFR daily rate on April 3, 2018, to prepare for its use as a benchmark rate.
The current transition timeline proposed by AARC has SOFR being the primary replacement for LIBOR in the U.S. by the end of 2021. The table below shows the ARRC’s anticipated completion dates and milestones to be achieved by those dates.
There are concerns about utilizing SOFR as a benchmark rate, and it will take time for enough liquidity to develop in the SOFR market to alleviate concerns regarding its viability as a benchmark. One issue is that SOFR is a spot rate from the median of overnight transactions, and it is likely to vary materially from day to day. Another issue is that SOFR has only a one-day tenor, whereas LIBOR has many different tenors.
What should companies consider?
Companies should inventory all agreements that reference LIBOR. Also, when executing new agreements, management should carefully consider language addressing alternative or fallback rates if LIBOR is unable to be determined. If contracts are not amended to include alternative rates or fallback provisions in the absence of LIBOR before the relevant LIBOR index is discontinued, it could cause settlement issues or render contracts invalid.
From an accounting and financial reporting standpoint, the impact could be substantial. The primary areas affected include hedge accounting and accounting for debt modifications. In addition, discount rates for impairment testing, lease accounting, asset retirement obligations and fair value estimates will need to be assessed. Fortunately, both the U.S. and international accounting regulatory bodies, FASB and IASB, appear to be aligned and will provide significant relief for the transition, particularly in the areas of hedge accounting and debt modifications. As of now, the actions by the FASB and IASB are tentative proposals, but additional guidance should be provided by the end of 2019.
What steps can be taken now?
At this stage in the process, companies should increase organizational awareness, carefully monitor the execution of new agreements referencing LIBOR and create an inventory of existing agreements and valuation models.
Increasing organizational awareness will be key for the transition away from LIBOR. While some may be aware of the impending LIBOR replacement, there may be a lack of appreciation of how broadly the event will impact the organization beyond hedging and debt activities. Increasing awareness throughout the organization will also assist in monitoring the execution of new agreements referencing LIBOR.
In summary, the replacement of LIBOR will have a significant impact globally. Oil and gas companies are encouraged to consider the impact to their organization and take steps to assess existing agreements and carefully monitor the execution of new agreements.
Shane Randolph is managing director at Opportune LLP. Jeff Nicholson is a senior consultant in the complex securities, hedging and stock-based compensation practice of Opportune LLP.
Recommended Reading
Hotter Temps Drive Japanese Demand for Spot LNG from US
2024-09-11 - Above-average temperatures are forecast for most regions of Japan through early October, compelling the country to seek prompt LNG, potentially from the U.S., to cover extended summer-related electricity demand.
FERC Approves Venture Global’s Calcasieu Pass 2 LNG Project
2024-06-27 - Venture Global’s Calcasieu Pass 2 was delayed due to changes at the overall site and within U.S. environmental law. The project remains subject to the LNG export pause initiated by the Biden administration.
Court Petitioned to Intervene in Calcasieu Pass 2 LNG Project
2024-09-09 - The D.C. Circuit is to consider the case for Venture Global's Calcasieu Pass 2 LNG facility in Louisiana.
TotalEnergies Joins Ruwais LNG Project in UAE
2024-07-11 - French energy giant TotalEneriges joined the two-train 9.6 million tonnes per annum Ruwais LNG project in the United Arab Emirates with a 10% interest. The LNG project is expected to start sending out cargos in the second half of 2028.
IGU: Global Liquefaction Capacity Expected to Grow by 75% by 2030
2024-07-02 - The International Gas Union (IGU) expects global liquefaction capacity to reach 700 mtpa by 2030, up 75% from 2023, driven by new FIDs and the start-up of other projects under construction.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.