Western Canada’s crude oil industry is preparing to embrace global markets, a turn that could leave the U.S. industry fighting for supply in 2024.
After years of delay and cost overruns, the Trans Mountain Pipeline expansion (TMX) is nearing completion. The 715-mile looping of Trans Mountain, Canada’s only liquids pipeline to the Pacific Coast, through Alberta and British Columbia will nearly triple maritime access for Western Canadian producers, increasing from 300,000 bbl/d to 890,000 bbl/d.
The estimated CA$31 billion expansion will have consequences for markets across North America, according to East Daley Analytics’ Crude Hub Model, affecting crude oil flows to refiners and terminal operators from Louisiana to the Midwest. We believe the project will be the most transformative for the U.S. market since the 2019-2021 period, when the industry built 4 MMbbl/d of new pipelines out of the Permian Basin.
Owned by the federal government, Trans Mountain is targeting the start-up of the TMX expansion in first-quarter 2024. A recent dispute over a 0.8-mile section of the route through British Columbia had threatened that timeline. Citing technical challenges, Trans Mountain had sought permission from the Canada Energy Regulator to move the pipeline route and use open-trench and horizontal drilling for construction, rather than a trenchless method involving micro-tunneling.
The Stk'emlupsemc Te Secwepemc Nation (SSN) had contested the request, citing surface disturbances on the land native to the First Nation. However, the CER granted the Trans Mountain request in late September, avoiding a potentially long delay.
Once TMX starts flowing from Edmonton, East Daley anticipates about 470,000 bbl/d of heavy Canadian sour production will be immediately displaced on competing pipelines like Enbridge’s Mainline and Express pipelines and TC Energy’s Keystone pipeline. Rail terminals, which predominantly export heavy sour production into the Midwest (PADD 2), also will see volumes decline, according to EDA’s Crude Hub Model.
Another group that will feel the effects is Gulf Coast refiners, particularly buyers in the St. James, Louisiana, market. Western Canada oil production currently moves south via ENB’s Mainline and Southern Access Extension pipelines, then to the Capline Pipeline (Plains All American Pipeline, 54%; Marathon Petroleum, 33%; BP 13% and terminates at St. James. Since its reversal in December 2021, Capline has become a key supplier of cheap barrels for Louisiana refiners priced at Western Canadian Select. Barrels from Canada compete with higher-priced heavy sour barrels produced from the Gulf of Mexico.
Recent data from Louisiana regulators show Capline’s imports from Patoka, Ill., averaged over 200,000 bbl/d in the spring, or more than double the pipeline’s firm commitments of about 102,000 bbl/d. Flows from Patoka remained strong at about 150,000 bbl/d in August. The data supports comments from Plains All American that Capline has become a preferred shipping route since the reversal. However, East Daley thinks there is near-term risk to half these volumes, particularly to flows over the commitment level.
According to financials filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and EDA’s asset-level Capline Pipeline model, Capline will generate about $170 million in EBITDA for 2023. Assuming long-haul shipments of Canadian crude fall back to commitment levels (102,000 bbl/d) in 2024, this would pose downside risk to earnings of about $64 million for the pipeline. As the majority 54% owner in Capline, Plains All American Pipeline would be subject to the biggest earnings impact of about $35MM, net to its 54% share.
Recommended Reading
LNG Sector Under Fire as Activists’ Lawsuits Surge
2024-10-10 - ESG litigation is increasingly affecting the LNG industry while, more broadly, nearly 70% of climate-related cases are filed in the U.S.
Moelis’ Cantor: Trump to Make American Energy Investable Again
2024-11-06 - Former GOP Majority Leader Eric Cantor, vice chairman and managing partner at Moelis, said EV subsidies are likely to be in the president’s crosshairs in his second term.
Bracewell: How Trump and Harris Differ (or Don’t) on Energy Policy
2024-10-16 - Presidential impact on energy prices is largely about perception, although LNG permitting, production incentives and the Inflation Reduction Act will be influenced depending on who is in the White House.
Belcher: Election Outcomes and Their Impacts on Future US Policy
2024-10-14 - Trump would back ‘energy dominance,’ while Harris would pursue a climate change agenda.
Significant ROI for Energy Lobbyists Willing to Invest in Capitol Expenditures
2024-11-01 - Influencing policy in Washington requires substantial investment in campaign donations and lobbying. But the ROI is substantial, as well.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.