A new round of U.S. solar panel import tariffs on Southeast Asian producers is expected to raise consumer prices and cut into producer profit margins, but was largely anticipated by industry, analysts said.
The new duties announced on Dec. 6 by the Commerce Department extend the U.S.' anti-dumping regime in Southeast Asia to solar cells, from just finished modules previously.
The tariff rise was largely in line with expectations, Citi analyst Pierre Lau said in a note, adding that in the longer term, the duties would encourage more production in the U.S., replacing imports.
"PRC module makers generally think the impact limited near term, assuming much of the incremental cost would be passed through to U.S. customers without alternatives," he added, however.
The determination is the second in a trade case brought by a group of companies, including South Korea's Hanwha Qcells and First Solar, accusing Chinese companies of unfairly selling below-cost solar components into the U.S.
Affected producers may source cells from Laos and Indonesia instead, or take the cut out of their profit margins, said Yana Hryshko, head of global solar supply chain research at consultancy WoodMackenzie.
"They want to stay competitive for the U.S. market," said Hryshko. "The actual manufacturing cost in Southeast Asia is not that high compared to the prices that they are selling to the United States."
Chinese-owned solar plants have already popped up in Indonesia and Laos, the key Southeast Asia manufacturing bases not yet covered by tariffs, although industry experts say they may be added once export volumes increase.
In the case of tariffs on Indonesia, the new capacity could be redirected into the burgeoning domestic market, however, Hryshko added, supported by local content requirements.
Some 80% of America's solar imports, which hit a record $15 billion last year, came from Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam in 2023.
The Commerce Department calculated anti-dumping rates of 271.28% for imports from Vietnam, 125.37% for Cambodia, 77.85% for Thailand and 21.31% for Malaysia, while major manufacturers have their own company-specific rates.
The U.S. makes up just 4% to 10% of major Chinese module makers' sales volumes, but a higher share of their earnings, according to Citi.
The commerce department's final order will be released on April 18, when the proposed duties could be revised.
Recommended Reading
Hibernia IV Joins Dawson Dean Wildcatting Alongside EOG, SM, Birch
2025-01-30 - Hibernia IV is among a handful of wildcatters—including EOG Resources, SM Energy and Birch Resources—exploring the Dean sandstone near the Dawson-Martin county line, state records show.
SM Energy Marries Wildcatting and Analytics in the Oil Patch
2025-04-01 - As E&P SM Energy explores in Texas and Utah, Herb Vogel’s approach is far from a Hail Mary.
Oxy CEO: US Oil Production Likely to Peak Within Five Years
2025-03-11 - U.S. oil production will likely peak within the next five years or so, Oxy’s CEO Vicki Hollub said. But secondary and tertiary recovery methods, such as CO2 floods, could sustain U.S. output.
Ring May Drill—or Sell—Barnett, Devonian Assets in Eastern Permian
2025-03-07 - Ring Energy could look to drill—or sell—Barnett and Devonian horizontal locations on the eastern side of the Permian’s Central Basin Platform. Major E&Ps are testing and tinkering on Barnett well designs nearby.
Burleson: Rockcliff Energy III Builds on Past Successes
2025-04-09 - Rockcliff Energy III is building on past experiences as it explores deeper in the Haynesville, CEO Sheldon Burleson told Hart Energy at DUG Gas.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.