![Noble Energy Sells Midstream Shale Assets In $1.6 Billion Dropdown](/sites/default/files/styles/hart_news_article_image_640/public/image/2019/11/noble-energy-sells-midstream-shale-assets-16-billion-dropdown.jpg?itok=do6ZMqz3)
The most ideal outcome for Noble Energy, according to Tudor, Pickering, Holt & Co., would have been a full midstream exit—including its Noble Midstream stake—depending on valuation. (Source: Hart Energy/Shutterstock.com)
Noble Energy Inc. is not letting go of its midstream business quite yet, though some analysts say the move is not the most ideal outcome.
On Nov. 15, the Houston-based independent said, in conclusion of a review launched earlier this year, it decided to retain and increase its ownership in Noble Midstream Partners LP through a dropdown transaction worth about $1.6 billion in cash and stock.
The dropdown includes essentially all of the company’s remaining U.S. onshore midstream interests and assets located in the Denver-Julesburg (D-J) and Permian basins plus the elimination of incentive distribution rights. Noble Energy estimates the EBITDA for the assets sold to be about $160 million for 2020
Phillips Johnston, E&P analyst with Capital One Securities Inc., said the transaction simplifies Noble’s midstream story and corporate structure while also allowing it to retain control of its midstream business.
“However, this outcome will likely be disappointing to some investors that were hoping for an outright sale of part or all of the midstream business to a third party, which would have brought in external cash proceeds and resulted in lower pro-forma leverage ratios and EV/EBITDA multiples,” Johnston wrote in a research note on Nov. 15.
The most ideal outcome, according to Tudor, Pickering, Holt & Co. (TPH), would have been a full midstream exit—including its Noble Midstream stake—depending on valuation.
“[The dropdown] transaction helps remove overhang associated with ongoing [Noble Energy] strategic review but raises question on depth of current midstream M&A market,” the TPH analysts wrote in a Nov. 15 research note.
Noble Midstream is an MLP formed in December 2014 by Noble Energy with the intention for the company to become its primary vehicle for midstream operations in the onshore U.S. outside of the Marcellus Shale. Noble took the company public in September 2016 in a $300 million IPO.
Following the close of the transaction, Noble Energy will own 56.5 million units or about 63% of the outstanding units of Noble Midstream. Noble Energy previously owned about 45.5% of Noble Midstream outstanding units, according to the company website.
The dropdown transaction includes:
- 60% working interest in the Delaware Basin gathering system, which services crude oil, natural gas, and water gathering;
- 75% working interest in the Mustang area (D-J Basin) gathering system, which services crude oil, natural gas, and water gathering, along with freshwater delivery;
- 75% working interest in the East Pony area (D-J Basin) gathering system, which services freshwater delivery; and
- 100% working interest in the East Pony area (D-J Basin) natural gas gathering and processing system.
![Noble Midstream Asset Acquisition Summary (Source: Noble Midstream Partners LP Investor Presentation November 15, 2019)](/sites/default/files/inline-images/Noble%20Midstream%20Asset%20Acquisition%20Summary%20Source%20Noble%20Midstream%20Partners%20LP%20Investor%20Presentation%20November%2015%202019.png)
The transaction will result in Noble Midstream owning 100% of the gathering systems. Additionally, Noble Midstream is set to service substantially all of Noble Energy’s U.S. onshore activity in the D-J and Delaware basins, where 90% of Noble 2019 U.S. onshore capital is expected to be invested.
The total transaction value for the dropdown comprises a mix of $670 million in cash and $930 million in 38.5 million newly-issued Noble Midstream units. The TPH analysts remain neutral on the transaction valuation.
For the transaction, the board of directors of Noble Midstream GP LLC was advised by BofA Securities on financial matters and Mayer Brown LLP on legal matters. The conflicts committee was advised by Baird on financial matters and Baker Botts LLP on legal matters. Noble Energy was advised by Citi on financial matters and Vinson & Elkins LLP on legal matters.
Recommended Reading
Barnett & Beyond: Marathon, Oxy, Peers Testing Deeper Permian Zones
2024-04-29 - Marathon Oil, Occidental, Continental Resources and others are reaching under the Permian’s popular benches for new drilling locations. Analysts think there are areas of the basin where the Permian’s deeper zones can compete for capital.
Permian Operations at Risk as Wastewater Equation Remains Unbalanced
2024-06-17 - Wastewater injection is a growing cause of induced seismic activity in oil- and gas-producing regions in the U.S., and without proper management solutions, operational capacities are at risk.
Industry Consolidation Reshapes List of Top 100 Private Producers in the Lower 48
2024-06-24 - Public-private M&A brings new players to top slots in private operators list.
ConocoPhillips: Permian Basin a ‘Growth Engine’ for Lower 48
2024-05-15 - ConocoPhillips views the Permian Basin as a “growth engine” within its Lower 48 portfolio, the company’s Midland Basin Vice President Nick McKenna said during Hart Energy’s SUPER DUG event in Fort Worth.
The OGInterview: BPX E-fracs Push ‘Values Up, Emissions Down,’ CEO Says
2024-07-02 - BPX Energy CEO Kyle Koontz discusses the company’s role as the “nimble entrepreneurial” arm of supermajor BP in the Permian Basin and Haynesville and Eagle Ford shales.