Several states want to ban natural gas drilling beneath the Great Lakes.
With gas prices rising dramatically in the past year, the resources available under the Great Lakes have become an enticing prospect - and a subject of controversy.
In 1986, the governors of the eight littoral states signed an agreement forbidding offshore drilling for oil, but gas drilling was not specifically mentioned. "This is sort of ambiguous, and I guess it leaves open the possibility that under the agreement you could drill for gas, but it would require the approval of the governor," said Freda Tarbell, a spokeswoman for the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection. So far, none of the Great Lakes states has permitted offshore drilling for gas. Illinois, Minnesota, Indiana, New York and Wisconsin have no wells and do not plan to engage in gas drilling.
Michigan has seven extended-reach wells, which produced 26,000 bbl of oil and 1.9 Bcf of gas from under the Great Lakes, and permits for 30 more onshore leases are pending. During the past 20 years, Michigan has produced nearly 440,000 bbl of oil and 17.9 Bcf of gas from beneath Lake Michigan. The Michigan Environmental Science Board investigated directional drilling and concluded "there is little to no risk of contamination to the Great Lakes bottom or waters." The state plans to make a decision about leasing lake acreage this summer. If the leasing program, which has been on hold since 1997, resumes, Michigan stands to receive between US $60 million and $100 million in royalties, said Lynne Boyd at the state's Department of Natural Resources.
In Wisconsin, state Sen. Robert Cowles of Green Bay has introduced a bill to ban any drilling for oil or gas beneath the Great Lakes, and state Rep. Jon Richards said he plans to introduce legislation that would ban drilling and pipelines beneath Lake Michigan and Lake Superior.
The Ohio Department of Natural Resources is researching the idea of drilling under its portion of Lake Erie at the request of state lawmakers, but said it has no position on such drilling. However, Ohio Gov. Bob Taft said he could not conceive of any situation in which he would support drilling for gas under Lake Erie. "Ohio has other sources of natural gas to explore," Taft told reporters.
Environmentalists say the lakes should not be threatened for what could turn out to be a relatively small amount of oil and gas. They say a drilling accident could foul drinking water supplies for millions and disrupt the state's $1 billion tourism industry.
In response to the Great Lakes drilling debate, US Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., introduced a bill to ban all drilling for oil or gas beneath the Great Lakes, including extended-reach wells on land. Nineteen other representatives have signed on as co-sponsors. Four members of Ohio's congressional delegation (Sen. George Voinovich and Reps. Marcy Kaptur, Dennis Kucinich and Steve LaTourette) have come out against drilling for gas in Lake Erie. "The Great Lakes represent 25% of the world's fresh water...To put that in jeopardy in any way is a serious mistake," LaTourette said. About 35 million people live in the region of the Great Lakes basin, which contains gas reserves of 1 Tcf.
Already gas drilling there
Gas drilling has been going on for decades on the Canadian side of Lake Erie, with some 550 wells producing, said Ruby Rybansky, chief engineer at the Petroleum Resources Centre in London, Ontario. "We've got an offshore natural gas industry that's been commercially active for more than 40 years," he said. Ontario allows offshore drilling between April and October, when there's no ice or fierce winter storms to prevent the drilling barges from accessing the gas fields. Offshore drilling for oil is prohibited by international agreements.
Ontario contributes 1.5% of Canada's gas production. Since the first well was drilled under Lake Michigan in 1979, about 438,000 bbl of oil and 17.5 Bcf of gas have been produced.
None of this controversy is new, Rybansky said. A similar debate raged during the international energy crunch of the 1970s, when the states were "extremely keen" to open Lake Erie to drilling. "That's when we had the big energy shock, prices skyrocketed and the political will changed," he said. "Gee, sounds familiar, doesn't it? "
Recommended Reading
Minerals M&A to Heat Up in ‘25 with $4B Diamondback Sale–KeyBanc
2025-01-21 - KeyBanc analysts expect an “imminent” Diamondback Energy dropdown to Viper Energy and at least a couple of $500 million deals by public mineral and royalty companies in 2025, with Sitio Royalties a likely acquirer.
Freehold Closes $182MM Acquisition of Midland Basin Interests
2024-12-16 - Freehold Royalties’ acquisition from a private seller includes around 1,300 boe/d of net production and 244,000 gross drilling acres largely operated by Exxon Mobil and Diamondback Energy.
Coterra Notches Year-End Permian Deal for $43MM
2024-12-31 - Coterra Energy will buy an additional 1,650 net royalty acres from Sandia Minerals LLC, the interests of which are owned by Franklin Mountain Royalty Investments, for $43 million.
On The Market This Week (Jan. 20, 2025)
2025-01-24 - Here is a roundup of marketed oil and gas interests in the Delaware Basin, Midcontinent and Bakken from select sellers.
In Busy Minerals M&A Year, Freehold Grabs $152MM Midland Interests
2024-12-10 - Canadian player Freehold Royalties is getting deeper in the Permian with a CA$216 million (US$152 million) Midland Basin acquisition as minerals buyers intensify M&A in the basin.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.