
The closest I’ve seen the U.S. come to this in my career was a few years ago when we hit peak production, Hendrickson wrote in a weekly column. (Source: Hart Energy)
This is an excerpt from the Ralph E. Davis Associates (RED) Weekly E&P Update Newsletter.
The Russian invasion of Ukraine has wreaked havoc on global crude oil markets to say the least. According to the International Energy Agency, Russia produces approximately 11.3 million bbl/d of crude oil, condensate and NGL, and they export a little under 8 million bbl/d. On March 7, Enverus estimated that sanctions on Russian oil could remove 3 million bbl/d from the market, and an oil price above $160/bbl would be needed to balance supply and demand.
The oil markets are in a very dynamic and unpredictable condition, but prices are certainly going to be significantly higher for some time. The price shock we’re experiencing has led to the usual calls for achieving U.S. “energy independence.” It’s not clear exactly what people mean when they say that. One definition could be that we produce all our hydrocarbon needs domestically; another could be that we get all of it from friendly trading partners, such as Mexico and Canada.
If the second definition is what’s meant, we aren’t too far from achieving that goal. The table below shows U.S. imports by country for December 2021, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). As you can see, we get the bulk of our imports from Canada and Mexico, and most of the other countries are ones I think most would consider friendly trading partners. Russia makes up about 7% of our imports, and depending on how you label the others, we probably get all but 1 million bbl/d to 1.5 million bbl/d from friendly nations. We’ve produced enough oil in the recent past that we could easily offset this amount, yet “energy independence” remains elusive.

Part of the problem with achieving “energy independence” is that petroleum is a global commodity. Another issue is petroleum isn’t a single thing, but a complex mixture of hydrocarbons. One barrel can’t necessarily be substituted for another since demand and refining capabilities vary.
Producing all our hydrocarbon needs domestically is a whole other matter, however, and I think this is what most people think when they say, “energy independence.” The closest I’ve seen the U.S. come to this in my career was a few years ago when we hit peak production. What happened then is exactly what one would expect in a global market. As we continued to increase production and supply more of our domestic needs, other producers with spare capacity had to accept a loss of market share. Eventually, this became unacceptable to them, and they lowered their prices. When that occurred, the highest cost barrels are the first ones out of the market, and unfortunately, many of our barrels are high cost (they’re certainly much higher than OPEC’s). Then imports rise to fill the domestic production loss.
So how can we achieve energy independence if doing so requires prices that are higher than the marginal costs of other producers? It seems to me we would have to isolate ourselves from the global market (that is, no imports or exports). This, of course, would be an unacceptable answer since it would result in much higher prices, wealth destruction and undermine our free-trade principles.
About the Author: Steve Hendrickson is the president of Ralph E. Davis Associates, an Opportune LLP company. Hendrickson has over 30 years of professional leadership experience in the energy industry with a proven track record of adding value through acquisitions, development and operations. In addition, he possesses extensive knowledge of petroleum economics, energy finance, reserves reporting and data management, and has deep expertise in reservoir engineering, production engineering and technical evaluations. Hendrickson is a licensed professional engineer in the state of Texas and holds an M.S. in Finance from the University of Houston and a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin. He recently served as a board member of the Society of Petroleum Evaluation Engineers and is a registered FINRA representative.
Recommended Reading
E&P Highlights: March 3, 2025
2025-03-03 - Here’s a roundup of the latest E&P headlines, from planned Kolibri wells in Oklahoma to a discovery in the Barents Sea.
Then and Now: 4D Seismic Surveys Cut Costs, Increase Production
2025-03-16 - 4D seismic surveys allow operators to monitor changes in reservoirs over extended periods for more informed well placement decisions. Companies including SLB and MicroSeismic Inc. are already seeing the benefits of the tech.
Woodside Awards SLB Drilling Contract for Project Offshore Mexico
2025-03-31 - SLB will deliver 18 ultra-deepwater wells for Woodside Energy’s Trion ultra-deepwater project starting in early 2026.
Halliburton Secures Drilling Contract from Petrobras Offshore Brazil
2025-01-30 - Halliburton Co. said the contract expands its drilling services footprint in the presalt and post-salt areas for both development and exploration wells.
PrePad Tosses Spreadsheets for Drilling Completions Simulation Models
2025-02-18 - Startup PrePad’s discrete-event simulation model condenses the dozens of variables in a drilling operation to optimize the economics of drilling and completions. Big names such as Devon Energy, Chevron Technology Ventures and Coterra Energy have taken notice.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.