New G7 and European Union sanctions on Russian oil exports will have a muted impact on flows and global prices according to analysts polled by Reuters, as Russia is set to largely succeed in rerouting its trade eastward.
The market is set to be deprived of a maximum of 2 MMbbl/d of Russian oil in the short term once the measures take effect on Dec. 5, and possibly none at all - a range not seen moving prices much upward.
The survey of 42 economists and analysts provides one of the most comprehensive perspectives yet of how the industry views the ambitious plan to deprive Moscow of revenue, revealing uncertainty on its impact but little deep concern.
"Russian exports will find other buyers in Asia in the long term. But in the short term the sanctions could result in some 1.5 MMbbl/d-2 MMbbl/d that will be taken off the market," said Frank Schallenberger, head of commodity research at German bank LBBW.
Commodities trading giant Vitol sees Russian flows declining by up to 1 MMbbl/d this winter despite building up its own shipping fleet, CEO Russell Hardy told the Financial Times.
Analysts at the Bank of Nova Scotia, however, saw oil export and production levels remaining relatively flat despite the sanctions.
Up to 80%-90% of Russian oil could still flow if Moscow seeks to flout the G7 price cap, a U.S. treasury official told Reuters last month, leaving 1 MMbbl/d-2 MMbbl/d shut in.
The International Energy Agency group of consumer countries deemed that an "encouraging level" to meet demand.
Concerns over waning Chinese demand due to strict COVID-19 policies and signs of a looming economic recession countered pessimism over losses of Russian supplies, analysts said.
"The implementation of Russian sanctions...will remove 1.5 MMbbl/d of supply from the market. Russian exports remain resilient, but the fact that there are now limited buyers or tankers willing to re-route over 3 MMbbl/d is expected to soon take a toll," Societe Generale analyst Florent Pele said.
"While we believe [the price cap] would be very difficult to implement, it would directionally raise the likelihood of more Russian oil staying on the market at any price."
Recommended Reading
FERC Reinstates Permit for Williams’ Mid-Atlantic Project
2025-01-27 - The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s latest move allows Williams’ Transco natural gas network to continue operations after a D.C. court shot down the expansion plan.
DC Circuit Denies Rehearing for Williams’ Mid-Atlantic Project
2025-01-23 - Williams Cos.’ Regional Energy Access will continue operating as the midstream company seeks an emergency FERC certificate to keep supplying natural gas to Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Maryland.
Williams’ CEO: Pipeline Permitting Costs Twice as Much as Steel
2025-03-12 - Williams Cos. CEO Alan Armstrong said U.S. states with friendlier permitting polices, including Texas, Louisiana and Wyoming, have a major advantage as AI infrastructure develops.
Exclusive: Kinder Morgan’s Fore on Pipeline Permitting Momentum in Past Year
2025-04-07 - Kinder Morgan’s Allen Fore, vice president of public affairs, delves into how the Trump administration’s initiatives to achieve energy dominance is a “game changer” for pipeline projects, in this Hart Energy Exclusive interview.
Intensity Infrastructure Partners Pitches Open Season for Bakken NatGas Egress
2025-02-04 - Analysts note the Bakken Shale’s need for more takeaway capacity as Intensity Infrastructure Partners launches an open season for a potential 126-mile natural gas transport line out of the basin.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.