With a growing focus on climate change, oil and gas companies are increasingly no longer attracting investments solely based on their ability to generate returns but also how environmentally responsible they are while generating those returns.
“The investor community is ultimately seeing a change in risk profiles of the oil and gas companies they are investing in and a growth opportunity, of course for ‘greener’ forms of energy,” David Linden, head of energy transition at Westwood Global Energy Group, told Hart Energy.
Since investors have different risk appetites, Linden said he is seeing oil and gas companies adopt different strategies in a push toward cleaner energy production. While the efforts of these companies can be divided according to ‘varying shades of green,’ Linden bucketed them into three major groups.
The first group of companies, which he referred to as the ‘greening companies’ are setting up emission reduction targets and going through the process of high-grading hydrocarbons, investments in renewables, e-mobility solutions, hydrogen and carbon capture with some rebranding themselves as integrated energy companies.
Within this group, there are different approaches, he said. For instance, BP plans to cut fossil fuel production by 40% over the next decade while TotalEnergies is focused on growing its hydrocarbon portfolio and renewables at the same time.
The benefit of this ‘greening’ strategy’ Linden said, is a derisking portfolio and safeguarding investor money in the longer term.
“But you have to be big and rich to do something like this and the money will ultimately come from hydrocarbons,” he said.
The second group, which Linden noted is the largest and most diverse group that consists of NOCs, midcaps and shale companies, is committed to reducing the so-called Scope 1 and 2 emission in their operations.
However, while these companies retain their core competencies doing what they do best, they face increasing pressure from both investors and climate activists amid growing energy demand.
The third group, harshly termed the ‘do nothing’ group, isn’t doing much to tackle climate change, Linden said.
“This group is consciously saying that there is all this ESG chat but I’m not going to do anything about this now…NOCs were accused of being in this category, but most of them are now are adopting energy transition in some shape or form,” he said.
Jump to a topic:
- Energy transition strategies (0:29)
- How complex is the path to net-zero? (8:55)
- U.K.’s energy crisis (13:07)
- Role of new technologies for low-carbon future (18:00)
Recommended Reading
California Resources Continues to Curb Emissions, This Time Using CCS for Cement
2025-03-04 - California Resources’ carbon management business Carbon TerraVault plans to break ground on its first CCS project in second-quarter 2025.
Baker Hughes CEO: Expect ‘Volatility, Noise’ Around Energy Transition
2025-03-12 - Baker Hughes and Linde executives spoke about lower carbon resources such as hydrogen and geothermal, which will be part of the energy mix but unlikely to displace natural gas.
Blue Hydrogen’s Carbon Management Needs Policy, Scale to be Realized
2025-04-18 - Expectations are high for blue hydrogen’s carbon capture rates, but some companies have work to do to hit the mark.
CarbonQuest Lands $20MM Funding for Carbon Capture Projects
2025-02-27 - The new funding is aimed at helping CarbonQuest achieve the lowest cost per ton in the carbon capture industry and improve system efficiency for North American customers.
BKV Reaches FID, Forms Midstream Partnership for Eagle Ford CCS Project
2025-02-13 - If all required permits are secured, BKV’s CCS project in the Eagle Ford Shale will begin full operations in first-quarter 2026, the Barnett natural gas producer says.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.