![](/sites/default/files/styles/hart_news_article_image_640/public/image/2019/02/shale-it-game.jpg?itok=EPUUGmtg)
Stratas Advisors conducts a game of trivia on 2018 unconventional resources dealing with production, drilling and field activity in U.S. shale. (Source: Tom Fox/Hart Energy)
[Editor's note: A version of this story appears in the January 2019 edition of Oil and Gas Investor. Subscribe to the magazine here.]
The beginning of a new year is a perfect time to reflect on the prior year. The stream of data is fresh and watercooler contests are shaping up.
As such, Stratas Advisors decided to conduct our own year in review, of sorts. To keep it fun, let’s kick everything off with a short game of “Shale On It,” a game of trivia where readers get a chance to answer 10 questions on 2018 unconventional resources. Some will be easy; others, less so. Without further ado, let the questions begin.
Production is near and dear to any prospector’s heart, so our questions start there. One note: While not all production numbers have been reported, enough data have been released to answer these.
1. Of the three major shales in the Permian (Bone Spring, Midland Basin-Wolfcamp and Delaware Basin-Wolfcamp), which play saw the lowest oil-production growth by volume?
2. Which play saw the greatest increase in oil production by volume?
3. By what percentage did overall Permian oil volumes grow in 2018?
4. Traveling north to Oklahoma, what shale was a game-changer for the Scoop in 2018?
5. Turning elsewhere, Proposition 112 threatened to derail what unconventional play in 2018?
This line of questions will focus on drilling and field activity. During 2018, a play highlighted in this column was said to be on track for 13% production growth in 2019 due to longer laterals and higher proppant loading.
6. What is the name of this play?
7. What play covered in this column in 2018 gave attribution to higher rig counts for rising 2018 production?
8. What is the average drilling time cited in this column for the Wolfcamp Shale?
Money is also near and dear to many a prospector. Hence, our remaining questions will query various economic areas.
9. First up, what play was characterized in this column as having a majority of wells with breakeven prices below $50 per barrel (bbl)?
Last one, Stratas projected total Rockies spending for 2018 in this column earlier in 2018.
10. What was the amount of total capital spending given?
Redirecting our attention to 2019, this seems an appropriate time to identify some early signposts for the year ahead. First up, compliance with the new round of production cuts.
Starting in January, a new agreement for production cuts takes effect. OPEC members, plus Russia, agreed to reductions totaling 1.2 million barrels per day until midyear. While Stratas expects these to largely comply, there are risks for noncompliance, especially if producers perceive their cuts are replaced by outsized shale production.
Second up, slowing growth in shale production, particularly slowing growth in the Permian. Swirling headwinds are expected to dampen the rate of growth in 2019. These headwinds include ongoing labor shortages, infrastructure constraints and flaring limits that are likely to continue through the first half of the year.
Labor shortages appear most problematic as there are no ready answers for particular skills in short supply. Infrastructure challenges should see reprieve around midyear. Flaring limits have become an issue in multiple areas due mostly to infrastructure bottlenecks. Stratas estimates the rate of growth in areas like the Permian could be halved compared with 2018.
Third, robust production growth in 2018 coupled with elevated demand risks led crude prices sharply lower in late-2018. Lower crude prices could further weigh on capital spending early in the year. Importantly, wells brought on in early 2019 carry a much greater weight on average annual production.
Each well added to production adds another layer to the production stack. Hence, the more wells added early, the thicker the total stack in the second half. The thicker the production stack in the second half, the greater the chances for a higher overall growth rate. Conversely, the thinner the stack, the slower the overall growth rate.
Fourth, breakthrough catalysts. Stratas is aware of and is monitoring several science projects that could extend the economic limits of select plays. At present, Stratas does not anticipate emerging technology to commercially alter the outlook for production in 2019. That said, breakthroughs can and do happen. Hence, it is prudent to keep tabs on the sciences.
Answers: 1. Bone Spring. 2. Delaware Basin Wolfcamp. 3. 43%. 4. Springer. 5. Wattenberg or Niobrara; each is a valid answer. 6. Haynesville. 7. Eagle Ford. 8. 22 to 26 days spud-to-spud. 9. Eagle Ford. 10. More than $12 billion.
Recommended Reading
EIA NatGas Storage Report Comes in at 10 Bcf Above Forecast
2024-08-22 - Most of the additional gas in storage came from the Appalachian Basin. The Midwest added 19 Bcf and the East added 12 Bcf, according to the EIA.
Oil Settles $1 Down After US Job Data Revised Significantly Lower
2024-08-21 - U.S. employers added far fewer jobs than originally reported in the year through March, the Labor Department said on Aug. 21.
US Gasoline Margins Slump on Lackluster Summer Demand
2024-08-21 - Gasoline futures were last down about 2.8% and their premium over West Texas Intermediate crude oil futures shrank to their weakest since Nov. 7, 2023.
Caliche Receives Investment from Sixth Street for Expansion of Storage Facilities
2024-08-20 - The bulk of Sixth Street’s investment is focused on Caliche’s Golden Triangle Storage project in Beaumont, Texas, and its Central Valley Gas Storage in Princeton, California.
One Killed in Offshore Natural Gas Pipeline Explosion in Louisiana
2024-08-20 - An offshore natural gas pipeline that exploded near Venice, Louisiana, on Aug. 17, killing one person, was owned by Whitney Oil and Gas, the U.S. Coast Guard said on Aug. 19.