Royal Dutch Shell Plc said on Dec. 2 it had scrapped plans to develop the Cambo oil field in the British North Sea, which became a lightning rod for climate activists seeking to halt the development of new oil and gas resources.
Following “comprehensive screening” of the Cambo Field, Shell “concluded the economic case for investment in this project is not strong enough at this time, as well as having the potential for delays,” the company said in a statement.
Private equity-backed Siccar Point, which owns a majority stake in the field, confirmed in a separate statement that “Shell has taken the decision to not progress its investment at this stage.”
The Cambo project off the Shetland Isles has been at the center of a political debate on whether Britain should develop new fossil fuel resources as it seeks to become a net-zero carbon economy by 2050.
Climate activists have pointed to a report by the International Energy Agency (IEA) saying that no new oil and gas projects should be developed in order to restrict global warming to 1.5 C.
“Cambo remains critical to the U.K.’s energy security and economy,” Siccar Point CEO Jonathan Roger said in a statement.
Britain’s government has also responded to the IEA report by saying energy security is important. During the COP26 climate conference which was held under British auspices last month, Britain also declined to join an alliance of countries pledging to stop new oil and gas developments on their territory.
“Whilst we are disappointed at Shell’s change of position ... we will continue to engage with the U.K. Government and wider stakeholders on the future development of Cambo,” Roger said.
Adam Matthews, chief responsible investment officer at Church of England Pensions Board, a shareholder which leads engagement with Shell over its energy transition strategy, welcomed the move.
“The message is clear to the U.K. Government (that ultimately decide if the field is exploited) that companies beginning to transition will not allocate the capital to such projects,” Matthews said in a tweet.
Friends of the Earth, an activist group which won a climate court case against Shell in the Netherlands this year applauded the move.
“The future of the project is now in serious doubt—as it should be. There is no need for a new oil field during a climate crisis,” the group said on Twitter.
Shell owns 30% in the project, while Siccar Point, which operates it, holds the remaining 70%. The field could produce up to 170 million boe and 53.5 Bcf of gas over 25 years, according to Siccar Point.
It was unclear whether the field could be developed without Shell’s support.
Shell faced another setback for its plans in the British North Sea in October when a regulator rejected plans to develop the Jackdaw gasfield after considering its environmental statement, industry sources said.
Recommended Reading
Utica’s Infinity Natural Resources Seeks $1.2B Valuation with IPO
2025-01-21 - Appalachian Basin oil and gas producer Infinity Natural Resources plans to sell 13.25 million shares at a public purchase price between $18 and $21 per share—the latest in a flurry of energy-focused IPOs.
Utica Oil’s Infinity IPO Values its Play at $48,000 per Boe/d
2025-01-30 - Private-equity-backed Infinity Natural Resources’ IPO pricing on Jan. 30 gives a first look into market valuation for Ohio’s new tight-oil Utica play. Public trading is to begin the morning of Jan. 31.
Murphy Shares Drop on 4Q Miss, but ’25 Plans Show Promise
2025-02-02 - Murphy Oil’s fourth-quarter 2024 output missed analysts’ expectations, but analysts see upside with a robust Eagle Ford Shale drilling program and the international E&P’s discovery offshore Vietnam.
Utica Oil Player Ascent Resources ‘Considering’ an IPO
2025-03-07 - The 12-year-old privately held E&P Ascent Resources produced 2.2 Bcfe/d in the fourth quarter, including 14% liquids from the liquids-rich eastern Ohio Utica.
Japan’s JAPEX Backs Former TreadStone Execs’ New E&P Peoria
2025-03-26 - Japanese firm JAPEX U.S. Corp. made an equity investment in Peoria Resources, led by former executives from TreadStone Energy Partners.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.