SilverBow Resources’ ongoing skirmish with shareholder Kimmeridge has resulted in a lengthy letter describing the Eagle Ford E&Ps successes and a warning that the investment firm is engaged in a “self-serving attempt to control SilverBow without paying fair value to shareholders.”
Both sides accused the other of misleading shareholders, with Kimmeridge Energy Management most recently saying in a letter that the best path forward is for SilverBow shareholders to elect three board members who are independent and not associated with Kimmeridge.
RELATED
Kimmeridge-SilverBow Public Feud Gets Ugly as Firm Suggests New Directors
On April 9, SilverBow countered that the three candidates Kimmeridge is proposing each have ties to the firm. In a letter to shareholders, SilverBow said that nominee Douglas Brooks served as director at California Resources Corp. during “Kimmeridge’s campaign at the company.”
Carrie Fox, another Kimmeridge nominee, “has a $3 million limited partnership interest in Kimmeridge Fund VI” and served as director at two companies with Ben Dell, Kimmeridge’s managing partner, SilverBow said. And Katherin Minyard was appointed to Ovintiv’s board as a Kimmeridge nominee, the company said.
SilverBow is promoting its own slate of independent directors: Gabriel L. Ellisor, Kathleen McAllister and Charles W. Wampler.
SilverBow said the Kimmeridge’s “proxy fight” is an attempt to gain control of the company and force a combination between SilverBow and Kimmeridge Texas Gas (KTG) “on terms that are unfavorable to SilverBow shareholders.”
Kimmeridge’s proposed combination between KTG and SilverBow would exchange for 32.4 million SilverBow shares at $34 per share. The offer includes an associated $500 million equity investment, Kimmeridge said.
Kimmeridge said a combination of the two companies would create a “preeminent, pure-play Eagle Ford Shale operator with an estimated enterprise value of approximately $3.6 billion.”
SilverBow’s market capitalization is about $870 million.
SilverBow is also proposing changes to the company’s governance at its May 21 annual meeting. The company would:
- Declassify the board and provide for the annual election of all directors;
- Adopt a majority voting standard in uncontested elections of directors; and
- Eliminate supermajority vote requirements for shareholders to amend certain provisions of the company’s certificate of incorporation.
Shareholders of record as of March 22 will be entitled to vote at the May 21 meeting.
Recommended Reading
As Rig Count Slips, Oil Production Keeps Growing
2024-10-22 - Despite the offshore rig market showing signs of demand slippage, oil production looks to be on the rise for the foreseeable future, Westwood analysts say.
How Chevron’s Anchor Took on the ‘Elephant’ in the GoM’s Deepwater
2024-08-22 - First oil at Chevron's deepwater Anchor project is a major technological milestone in a wider industry effort to tap giant, ultra-high-pressure, high-temperature reservoirs in the Gulf of Mexico.
With Montney Production Set to Grow, US E&Ps Seize Opportunities
2024-10-02 - Canada’s Montney Shale play has already attracted U.S. companies Ovintiv, Murphy and ConocoPhillips while others, including private equity firms, continue to weigh their options.
Amid Flagging US Activity, OFS Sector Looks to 2025—and Overseas
2024-08-13 - Despite a slowdown in U.S. activity expected to last until 2025, overseas and offshore markets helped the oilfield services sector deliver solid second-quarter results.
E&P Highlights: Aug. 12, 2024
2024-08-12 - Here’s a roundup of the latest E&P headlines, with a major project starting production in the Gulf of Mexico and the latest BLM proposal for oil and gas leases in North Dakota.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.