It is time to address the 800-pound gorilla in the room. Oil prices have dropped 16% over the last 90 days, with the decline accelerating as slowing global demand and rising domestic supply displace imported light sweet crude, forcing it back onto the world market.
The global impact from rising U.S. light sweet crude production is evident in the fact that crude prices are falling even as geopolitical events in Iraq, Russia and North Africa disrupt international supply growth. In other words, the oversupply situation could be worse.
The industry might be in for an extended period of sub-$90 oil after word spread in early October that the Saudis had a change of heart and are opting to pursue market share in Asia and Europe. Previously, the Saudis reduced production to defend higher prices.
So what is the potential impact if sub-$90 oil becomes a new normal? Historically, the industry last saw an extended run of sub-$90 oil in the second quarter 2012. Industry response surprised pundits and participants alike. At the time, the discussion among observers was that the breakeven price for oil was in the high $50 to low $60 range. But oil prices in the mid-$80s stopped rig count in its tracks, leading to an oversupply situation in oilfield services that lasted until early 2014.
Hart Energy’s industry revenue model illustrates the impact. The model, based on pricing and production for domestic oil, NGL and natural gas, fell from $28 billion monthly in January 2012 to $22 billion in June 2012. Oil revenues alone registered a 24% decline monthly, peak to trough, and represented a $4.9 billion nominal drop between March and June of 2012.
Extrapolating that model to the current environment indicates an industry better prepared. Oil revenues reached a record $26.2 billion in July 2014, the last month for which full data is available. Indeed, total domestic oil and gas revenue for July 2014 fell just shy of $40 billion. Only four other months witnessed higher revenue. Two of these were in May and June 2014 when the industry recorded revenues above $39.6 billion monthly. The other two were in June and July 2008 when industry revenue topped $41 billion monthly on an average $127 per barrel (bbl) for oil. Revenues eventually fell to $14.3 billion in May 2009 after the financial market collapse.
Oil has since led industry revenue higher on the basis of production volume growth. In July 2008, Lower 48 daily oil production was 4.5 MMbbl. That number was 8.1 MMbbl in July 2014. Oil now represents two-thirds of domestic revenue and exceeds total industry revenues for oil, NGL and gas as recently as third-quarter 2012. Tight formation oil—and high commodity price—has been transformational.
That said, every $1 drop in the price of oil registers as a $290 million decline in monthly industry revenue, or $3.5 billion annually. A sustained market of $85 oil would remove $52 billion in annual revenue, or about 11% below annualized levels of $480 billion based on July 2014 data.
If lower oil prices cause operators to reduce fieldwork, the situation compounds as high decline rates in existing tight formation wells accelerate the drop in revenue over time, leading to even less fieldwork.
When do operators pull back? Breakeven prices are a potential marker, but tend to reflect top performance in a region rather than the average. Coupled with regional price discounts, activity slows long before breakeven is reached. Currently, tight formation breakeven is in the low $60s, while regional differentials are knocking $7 to $10 off posted WTI.
Mitigating factors could soften the blow. Operators have hedged, which will protect activity for a while in a lower price environment. Secondly, the industry has gotten more efficient, though productivity gains in drilling have flattened, according to Baker Hughes' third-quarter well count.
Operators appear to be getting more out of the ground on the basis of enhanced completions. Still, rising costs associated with enhanced completions, coupled with falling revenues from commodity prices, indicate operators will find themselves in a margin squeeze just as they stood on the threshold of positive free cash flow in 2015.
Industry cites technology as the key to improve performance. However, new technology historically has been the tool allowing the industry to cope with deflating commodity prices and keep the gorilla in the room at bay.
For more on pricing and how markets are affecting activity and economics in the Permian Basin, join us at Hart Energy’s
Recommended Reading
SM Energy Adds Petroleum Engineer Ashwin Venkatraman to Board
2024-12-04 - SM Energy Co. has appointed Ashwin Venkatraman to its board of directors as an independent director and member of the audit committee.
NOV Appoints Former Denbury CEO Chris Kendall to Board
2024-12-16 - NOV Inc. appointed former Denbury CEO Chris Kendall to its board, which has expanded to 11 directors.
Geologist James Parr Joins Ring as EVP of Exploration, Geosciences
2024-11-26 - James Parr joins Ring Energy with over 30 years of experience as a petroleum geologist and leader in multiple energy organizations.
BP Profit Falls On Weak Oil Prices, May Slow Share Buybacks
2024-10-30 - Despite a drop in profit due to weak oil prices, BP reported strong results from its U.S. shale segment and new momentum in the Gulf of Mexico.
Utica Oil E&P Infinity Natural Resources Latest to File for IPO
2024-10-05 - Utica Shale E&P Infinity Natural Resources has not yet set a price or disclosed the number of shares it intends to offer.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.