The effect of (LNG) exports on domestic natural gas prices would likely not be impactful, according to a new study from Rice University's James Baker Institute for Public Policy. The paper, authored by Kenneth Medlock, the institute's Baker Fellow in Energy and Resource Economics, also predicts that the long-term volume of LNG exports would not likely be very large.
The study, U.S. LNG Exports: Truth and Consequence, concludes the model that has been presented to policymakers is flawed because it assumes a certain volume of exports rather than recognizing that international market response will ultimately limit the amount of LNG exported.
"The question before policymakers is one of licensing a capability, not licensing a fixed volume," Medlock says. "Therefore, this issue must be viewed in the context of international trade if informed policy decisions are to be made."
As an example, Medlock points to the shutdown of all of Japan's nuclear reactors in the wake of the Fukushima Daiichi disaster in 2011, causing LNG price indexes to jump markedly.
"The implication is that the price difference that currently exists in Asia and the rest of the world is at least partially the result of short-term constraints, or transitory factors, meaning they could not be expected to persist," Medlock says. "In fact, the pre-Fukushima pricing relationship ... can be expected to re-emerge as both new LNG delivery capacity is brought online, new sources of supply are developed and, in particular, if Japan's nuclear reactors are restarted."
Furthermore, the study argues that, although LNG gas prices abroad are currently high, the next three decades are not projected to be profitable for U.S. LNG exports. The study based this observation on growing competition in countries with new shale and pipeline developments, including China, Russia, Australia and Argentina.
"If shale opportunities in Europe and Asia, and other sources of imported pipeline and LNG supply can be brought to market, then growth in global production will put downward pressure on prices everywhere," Medlock says.
Medlock's advice to policymakers: "The implication for policy is simple: Market responses will ultimately limit export volumes. The hand-wringing about domestic price impacts is based largely on an incomplete assessment of what should be addressed as an international trade question."
Recommended Reading
Midstream M&A Adjusts After E&Ps’ Rampant Permian Consolidation
2024-10-18 - Scott Brown, CEO of the Midland Basin’s Canes Midstream, said he believes the Permian Basin still has plenty of runway for growth and development.
Post Oak-backed Quantent Closes Haynesville Deal in North Louisiana
2024-09-09 - Quantent Energy Partners’ initial Haynesville Shale acquisition comes as Post Oak Energy Capital closes an equity commitment for the E&P.
Analyst: Is Jerry Jones Making a Run to Take Comstock Private?
2024-09-20 - After buying more than 13.4 million Comstock shares in August, analysts wonder if Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones might split the tackles and run downhill toward a go-private buyout of the Haynesville Shale gas producer.
Aethon, Murphy Refinance Debt as Fed Slashes Interest Rates
2024-09-20 - The E&Ps expect to issue new notes toward redeeming a combined $1.6 billion of existing debt, while the debt-pricing guide—the Fed funds rate—was cut on Sept. 18 from 5.5% to 5%.
Dividends Declared Sept.16 through Sept. 26
2024-09-27 - Here is a compilation of dividends declared from select upstream, midstream and service and supply companies.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.