The effect of (LNG) exports on domestic natural gas prices would likely not be impactful, according to a new study from Rice University's James Baker Institute for Public Policy. The paper, authored by Kenneth Medlock, the institute's Baker Fellow in Energy and Resource Economics, also predicts that the long-term volume of LNG exports would not likely be very large.
The study, U.S. LNG Exports: Truth and Consequence, concludes the model that has been presented to policymakers is flawed because it assumes a certain volume of exports rather than recognizing that international market response will ultimately limit the amount of LNG exported.
"The question before policymakers is one of licensing a capability, not licensing a fixed volume," Medlock says. "Therefore, this issue must be viewed in the context of international trade if informed policy decisions are to be made."
As an example, Medlock points to the shutdown of all of Japan's nuclear reactors in the wake of the Fukushima Daiichi disaster in 2011, causing LNG price indexes to jump markedly.
"The implication is that the price difference that currently exists in Asia and the rest of the world is at least partially the result of short-term constraints, or transitory factors, meaning they could not be expected to persist," Medlock says. "In fact, the pre-Fukushima pricing relationship ... can be expected to re-emerge as both new LNG delivery capacity is brought online, new sources of supply are developed and, in particular, if Japan's nuclear reactors are restarted."
Furthermore, the study argues that, although LNG gas prices abroad are currently high, the next three decades are not projected to be profitable for U.S. LNG exports. The study based this observation on growing competition in countries with new shale and pipeline developments, including China, Russia, Australia and Argentina.
"If shale opportunities in Europe and Asia, and other sources of imported pipeline and LNG supply can be brought to market, then growth in global production will put downward pressure on prices everywhere," Medlock says.
Medlock's advice to policymakers: "The implication for policy is simple: Market responses will ultimately limit export volumes. The hand-wringing about domestic price impacts is based largely on an incomplete assessment of what should be addressed as an international trade question."
Recommended Reading
Analysts: Trump’s Policies Could Bring LNG ‘Golden Era’ or Glut
2024-11-27 - Rystad warns that too many new LNG facilities could spell a glut for export markets.
US House Schedules Hearing on LNG Pause
2024-12-03 - A Department of Energy official has been reported to testify at the Dec. 4 hearing on the harmful effects of production and export of LNG.
First-half 2024's US LNG Exports Rise 3%, DOE Says
2024-10-11 - U.S. LNG exports rose 3% in the first half of 2024 compared to the same six month period in 2023 and the top 10 countries importing U.S. LNG accounted for 67% of the North American country’s LNG exports in the first half of 2024, according to a recent report from the U.S. DOE.
Exclusive: Kimmeridge’s Dell on Advancing Commonwealth LNG Amid DOE Pause
2024-09-27 - Kimmeridge’s Co-founder and Managing Partner Ben Dell details how Commonwealth LNG came to be and the future of the project as the company is optimistic on an FID in the first half of 2025, in this Hart Energy Exclusive interview.
Mexico Pacific’s Saguaro: LNG’s Quicker Route to Asian Markets
2024-11-19 - Mexico Pacific’s 30-mtpa Saguaro LNG terminal promises a connection to Asia for Permian Gas that avoids the Panama Canal.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.