The lack of infrastructure has been a consistent theme during this initial wave of LNG exports from the U.S.
With demand for U.S. LNG continuing to ramp up globally, exporters are trying to get out of infrastructure problems for the next LNG wave, according to an 85-page study by BTU titled “Getting to the Gulf. Can We Supply Wave 2 LNG?”
But a concern addressed in the BTU report is that the midstream sector may over-correct the first wave by overbuilding to deal with the anticipated LNG export demands, particularly along the Gulf Coast.
“We have an extreme propensity in U.S. markets to overbuild infrastructure,” BTU analyst Anthony Scott said during a conference call to discuss the study on Sept. 4. “If you look at LNG imports as an example many of the LNG export facilities exist today because they were LNG import facilities that were ultimately never utilized.”
RELATED:
- What’s Affecting Gas Prices? (Week Of Sept. 10, 2019)
- Natural Gas: Bigger Market, Tougher Forecast
- Freeport LNG Raises $1.025 Billion For Train 4 Expansion
This next wave of LNG demand, which the BTU analysis believe will last through 2030, will be much greater than it is now, especially with China and other Asian nation demanding more and more of the natural gas resource. The anticipation has brought about more investment projects for additional pipelines from natural gas producing basins like the Permian, Haynesville and Eagle Ford as well as export facilities around the Gulf Coast, in Beaumont, Texas, and Louisiana.
Many of the projects have either started or are entering final investment decision (FID). But some are on hold as investors hope to get a clearer picture of the growth as exporters look to move production to market during Wave 2 LNG. Increased regulations from government at the state and federal levels also figure to delay or kill projects, which could affect pricing.
“In the long run, you look at the growth in China and Asia and the global push towards gas and away from coal there is a lot of desire to feed that demand in the long term to the extent that it comes to fruition fast,” Scott said. “Particularly concerning is the regulatory environment here changes in a way that getting supplies into these facilities becomes a long-term structural challenge. It could price that capacity out of the global market.”
BTU forecasts that LNG demand will hit 15.1 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d), or 115 mtpa, of exports by 2030. The Wave 2 LNG forecast factors in risk to global growth and the ability to consistently supply coast-competitive natural gas to facilities.
The study points at the expected level of demand could be met by the facilities that are already reaching FID. But if all the projects that are in FID and those that are expected to get funded are built then utilization of total U.S. export capacity may not reach capacity.
The regulatory environment could affect pipeline infrastructure and ultimately what gets built and what doesn’t. Investors certainly want to avoid the bottlenecks that seemed to define the first wave of LNG.
“Building new pipeline and infrastructure in the US is getting incrementally harder basically on a day to day basis,” Scott said.
The Atlantic Coast and Appalachian pipelines have become known for anti-pipeline battles and delays. Currently, Atlantic Coast Pipeline has put construction on hold because of the delays.
“So as we think about building this Wave 2 it is not a guarantee that those pipelines can be constructed particularly if they need to go through area where the regulatory environments have gotten more challenging,” Scott said. “Unfortunately for most of these projects, they are all going to be interstate pipelines, unless you are going in the state of Texas and subject to the FERC review process, So that potentially adds significant delays and potential for cost overruns.
“And it’s not just projects in Appalachia that have seen FERC delays.”
Scott says even the Permian has had to fight to keep projects from being delays or held up. Those delays are having ramifications on costs.
“What use to be a relatively straight forward process with FERC, now you have delays and potential stoppages all along the way and that just adds costs,” Scott said. “Part of the study is what we’ve done is really analyze what those costs might look like for that new build infrastructure.”
Recommended Reading
Babcock & Wilcox Sell Italian, Swedish Businesses
2024-10-10 - Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises will focus on core business lines, including coal-to-natural gas conversions in the U.S., the company said.
Exxon Adds 270,000 Acres for Largest Carbon Storage Site in the US
2024-10-10 - Exxon Mobil has leased acreage on the Gulf Coast from the Texas General Land Office for carbon capture and storage.
After M&A, Some ‘Stingy’ E&Ps Plan to Hold Operated Shale Inventory
2024-10-10 - After a whirlwind run of upstream consolidation, experts anticipated a wave of portfolio rationalization and divestitures. But with high-quality drilling locations already scarce, E&Ps may cling to operated inventory.
Ares Management Launches Public Offer of Stock to Offset M&A Cost
2024-10-09 - Ares will use the net proceeds from the offer will to cover a portion of the cash consideration for its previously announced $3.7 billion acquisition of the international business of GLP Capital Partner.
Bankers' Outlook for A&D: A Slow Unwinding of Asset Sales
2024-10-09 - Bankers from CrossFirst, Texas Capital, BOK Financial and Comerica say that after a sluggish season of asset level deals, divestitures will come from larger-scale M&A, but it will take time.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.