There would likely be a lively debate about the start of the subsea processing era.
Some might date it back to the Troll Pilot project, the subsea separation and water reinjection system offshore Norway by Norsk Hydro in the late 1990s, or maybe even Lufeng 13-1, Statoil’s Chinese floater project from the mid-1990s that featured a seabed pumping module to assist in the recovery of the heavy-ish oil.
For me, it would probably be Statoil’s Tordis subsea separation, boosting and injection system, which was ordered in 2005 and came onstream three years later. Troll Pilot was a bit of a false dawn—it seemed to presage the arrival of more such systems, but it did not. While it was more than a glorified R&D project—Hydro had a genuine requirement for a solution to an apparent projected overabundance of produced water at Troll C—it would be five years before another application came along.
Tordis was, at least according to Statoil, the first commercial application of subsea separation, meaning the system would recover an additional 35 MMbbl of oil (at 2005’s $55/bbl oil price) with the revenue from that production far exceeding the $275 million price tag.
Like its predecessor at Troll, it had a teething problem that had nothing to do with the technology of the separation system. At Troll Pilot, it was the shrouding on the high-power connector that failed and set back full operation by more than six months, while at Tordis, it was a water disposal well drilled into the wrong (i.e., unsealed) strata, which percolated to the seabed and then to the surface.
So why rehash these old stories? Subsea processing is seen as an expensive add-on to facilitate the extra production that makes deepwater developments profitable, and it might just be shelved in the current climate. So is it still economically viable and accessible in a low-price era?
There might be a grain of truth in the “high-cost” perception, but it is not the whole story.
Two points: First, what followed Tordis was Total’s Pazflor, a development that aimed to produce from multiple reservoirs with two different types of oil. Without the subsea separation system, the heavier Miocene oil could not be produced. This also was the first development in which subsea separation was in the base case.
In addition, there have been a considerable number of boosting systems, such as on Ceiba and Topacio in Equatorial Guinea, Azurite in the Congo and Exeter-Mutineer in Australia, that made the projects fly.
Of more significance is the potential cost-saving element in another of the technologies under the subsea processing umbrella—subsea raw water injection (SSRWI).
This has been one of my pet favorites, which has so much going for it now and which will increase as time goes by, with ever-more long-distance tiebacks planned. There have been several SSRWI projects with different raisons d’être. The first was Columba in the U.K. sector, where a major brownfield engineering exercise was avoided by putting everything on the seabed with the only link to its host being a power umbilical.
The second was Tyrihans, where Statoil avoided the cost of a 43-km (27-mile) pipeline and the requisite topside water cleanup, pumping and power equipment to provide water for injection.
It is a no-brainer. SSRWI is the coming technology at any price.
Recommended Reading
Venture Global LNG Files Paperwork for IPO
2024-12-20 - Venture Global LNG filed initial paperwork for an IPO on Dec. 20, about a week after the company’s Plaquemines LNG facility started production.
Rising Phoenix Names Executive as New Director of Capital
2024-12-19 - Rising Phoenix Capital appointed Ben Fujihara, a tenured financial executive, to oversee the company’s capital strategy, investor relations and business development.
Matador Appoints Paul W. Harvey to Board
2025-01-29 - Harvey holds over 40 years of investment experience and is currently the private wealth adviser at Dallas-based Vaquero Private Wealth.
Spartan Delta Ups Bought Deal Financing to $59MM
2025-01-14 - Underwriters have agreed to purchase approximately 22.2 million of Spartan Delta Corp. common shares, for resale to the public, at CA$3.82 per share (US$2.66), the company said.
Magnolia’s Board Adds Ropp as Independent Director
2025-01-07 - Alongside his experience in oil and gas operations, R. Lewis Ropp has a background in finance, capital markets and investment management, Magnolia Oil & Gas said.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.