President Joe Biden and his administration “really want to see less oil and gas produced in the United States,” IPPA Chairman Steve Pruett said at Super DUG. (Source: Shutterstock)
FORT WORTH, Texas—The U.S. oil and gas industry is fighting a Biden administration intent on eviscerating production, the chairman of the IPAA told SUPER DUG attendees on May 22.
“The Biden energy policy, frankly, is schizophrenic or maybe it’s bipolar in that…my Democratic lobbyist friends tell me that when Joe Biden speaks off-script, believe what he says. And when he says ‘no new drilling,’ that’s his heart speaking,” said Steve Pruett, leader of the industry group and president and CEO of Elevation Resources.
And while Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm is doing her best to speed up project permitting, “the reality is the Biden administration and his staff really want to see less oil and gas produced in the United States,” Pruett said. “And there’s no way that the renewable strategy or the ‘energy transition,’ as he calls it, can meet the needs of not only this nation, but of our strategic allies across the globe.”
The solution, he told moderator Nissa Darbonne, Hart Energy’s executive editor-at-large, is to enact significant changes to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). In convincing Congress to tackle NEPA reform, IPAA has found what some might consider an unexpected ally: the renewable energy lobby.
“Without reforms, this country will not have the electricity it needs to implement the electrification strategy that the Biden administration has put forward,” Pruett said.
Friends in the House
What the industry wants is included in a piece of legislation labeled H.R. 1, known as the Lower Energy Costs Act. Introduced by Rep. Steve Scalise (R-La.) and passed by the House in March, the bill provides the relevant cabinet secretary with authority to deem NEPA requirements satisfied – if a proposed environmental assessment or environmental impact statement is substantially the same as a previously completed assessment or statement.
“If there’s hope that I can leave with you all today, is that we have a very qualified, interested, informed House of Representatives that have been very supportive,” Pruett told attendees. “H.R. 1 was the most comprehensive energy legislation in our time.”
If passed into law, the legislation would expedite the development, importation and exportation of energy resources by:
- Waiving environmental review requirements and other specified requirements under certain environmental laws;
- Eliminating certain restrictions on the import and export of oil and natural gas;
- Prohibiting the president from declaring a moratorium on the use of hydraulic fracturing;
- Directing the Department of the Interior to conduct sales for the leasing of oil and gas resources on federal lands and waters; and
- Limiting the authority of the administration to restrict or delay the development of energy on federal land.
The measure would also reduce royalties for oil and gas development on federal land and eliminate charges on methane emissions if it became law.
Which it won’t.
Chances of passing the Democrat-controlled Senate are nil and President Biden has vowed to veto H.R. 1 if it did.
The Biden administration “wants to work in [a] bipartisan manner with Congress to address lowering energy costs, permitting reform and addressing energy challenges,” the White House said in a statement following passage in the House. “However, H.R. 1 would take us backward.”
Biden: “No plan”
Still, as Darbonne noted, the Biden administration gave the green light to the Willow project in Alaska.
Pruett called the decision a great win for ConocoPhillips and the state of Alaska, but noted that it doesn’t resolve troubled federal leasing policies.
The Department of the Interior has yet to release a five-year offshore leasing plan following expiration of the previous program in June 2022. He called the administration’s leasing efforts “minimal” and, in federal offshore waters, well behind what is needed to maintain future growth.
“Willow, you know, that’s a move in the right direction, but that’s many years away,” he said. “But the offshore leasing just hasn’t happened, and there’s no plan.”
Recommended Reading
Enverus: M&A Set to Cool with Smaller Deals, Higher Breakevens
2025-01-21 - With fewer acquisition targets, Enverus Intelligence Research said the quality of acquired inventory is declining, with breakevens averaging $50/bbl in 2024 versus $45/bbl in 2022 and 2023.
Major Interest: Chevron, Shell Join Vaca Muerta Crude Pipe Project
2025-01-20 - Oil producers are pumping record levels from Argentina’s Vaca Muerta shale. Chevron and Shell have backed a new crude pipeline project that aims to boost takeaway capacity—and exports—of Vaca Muerta oil.
Permian to Drive Output Growth as Other Basins Flatten, Decline–EIA
2025-01-14 - Lower 48 oil production from outside the Permian Basin—namely, the Bakken and Eagle Ford shales—is expected to flatten and decline in coming years, per new EIA forecasts.
Langford Enters Midland Basin with Murchison Oil and Gas Deal
2025-01-14 - Langford Energy Partners closed on an acquisition of 8,000 acres in the Midland Basin from Murchison Oil and Gas LLC.
More Uinta, Green River Gas Needed as Western US Demand Grows
2025-01-14 - Natural gas demand in the western U.S. market is rising, risking supply shortages later this decade. Experts say gas from the Uinta and Green River basins will make up some of the shortfall.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.