A ban against hydraulic fracturing is unlikely due to “the scientific evidence available today and the economic impact of shutting down shale-gas drilling”—but increased regulation could hike drilling and completion costs by as much as $500,000. This according to a report from Tudor, Pickering, Holt & Co. and Reservoir Research Partners. The analysts who authored the study say the cost increase—while not a “game-changer”—could arrive via either state or federal regulations drawn up in reaction to the ongoing fracing debate.
As industry feared, the Macondo oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico and recent accidents in shale plays have heated up the fracing debate.
“If you think no-one will connect deepwater oil to onshore shale, think again,” according to the authors. “Both the oil spill and recent natural gas drilling accidents spotlight the inherently difficult nature of the oil and gas business and have tarnished industry credibility.”
Operators may face additional costs per well even without federal regulation (which the analysts think is doubtful), of $200,000 to $500,000. Extra well casing, more rigorous cementing and water treatment all will play into the cost increases, with some plays requiring more attention than others.
The Environmental Protection Agency recently held its first public hearing on fracing in preparation for a study it is undertaking on the practice. If Congress mandates EPA oversight, look for costs to increase by an additional $125,000 to $250,000 per well.
Companies who are already adopting best practices regarding water disposal, such as recycling initiatives in the Marcellus shale, are ahead of the game.
“The industry will have no choice but to spend more money to protect itself from liability and reputational risk as the shale-drilling boom marches on,” notes the report.
“Some companies are in fact already choosing to spend more; one major producer told us: ‘We don’t see the costs as that overwhelming.’
“In Pennsylvania, where the economy is already transformed by the drilling boom, producers told us it is simply worth it financially to go up against a wall of opposition to drill a well,” the analysts say. “Even in some regions of New York, we believe companies with strong nerves and a willingness to control their environmental footprint will drill profitable leases—eventually.”
For coverage of the first EPA public hearing on fracing held recently in Denver, see the Newswell article in this issue.
Recommended Reading
Artificial Lift Firm Flowco’s Stock Surges 23% in First-Day Trading
2025-01-22 - Shares for artificial lift specialist Flowco Holdings spiked 23% in their first day of trading. Flowco CEO Joe Bob Edwards told Hart Energy that the durability of artificial lift and production optimization stands out in the OFS space.
Not Sweating DeepSeek: Exxon, Chevron Plow Ahead on Data Center Power
2025-02-02 - The launch of the energy-efficient DeepSeek chatbot roiled tech and power markets in late January. But supermajors Exxon Mobil and Chevron continue to field intense demand for data-center power supply, driven by AI technology customers.
Murphy Shares Drop on 4Q Miss, but ’25 Plans Show Promise
2025-02-02 - Murphy Oil’s fourth-quarter 2024 output missed analysts’ expectations, but analysts see upside with a robust Eagle Ford Shale drilling program and the international E&P’s discovery offshore Vietnam.
The Private Equity Puzzle: Rebuilding Portfolios After M&A Craze
2025-01-28 - In the Haynesville, Delaware and Utica, Post Oak Energy Capital is supporting companies determined to make a profitable footprint.
Oilfield Services Firm Flowco Files IPO Paperwork
2024-12-09 - Oilfield services provider Flowco filed paperwork for an IPO, one of several energy-focused players seeking to test the public markets.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.