The ability to deal with extreme water depths of potentially up to 4,500 m (15,000 ft) has required the identification and qualification of completely different foam buoyancy components.
Aberdeen-based specialist Balmoral Offshore Engineering has tackled the challenge specifically with the issue of ultra-heavy riser strings in mind. The prize? The global drill riser buoyancy market is conservatively estimated to be worth around US $320 million annually, according to the company.
This is not to say, however, that these are depths not encountered by it before. Balmoral has produced other buoyancy products for even deeper waters. It supplies, for example, high-performance low-density pure foam (LDF) composite buoyancy stems for specialized ROVs and AUVs that regularly venture into more than 4,000 m (13,000 ft) water depth, although mostly at present as part of oceanographic research and mapping activity.
It also has qualified an LDF composite system with a density of 650 kg/cu m. (1,433 lb/3.3 ft) that is rated for 10,000 m (32,800 ft) – about as deep as it gets offshore – so water depth in itself is not a problem.
Reducing the submerged weight
Minimizing top tension and preventing stress in a riser is a problem for the oil and gas industry as it carries out exploration and development activity in ultra-deep waters around the world in addition to reducing loadings during deployment or retrieval of a BOP stack. Hence the requirement for improved riser buoyancy to provide more uplift by effectively decreasing the submerged weight of the steel riser joints. This has led to a dramatic improvement in riser buoyancy in terms of product design and materials technology. "It can no longer be looked upon as a 'commodity' product," said Jim Hamilton, Balmoral international business
development director. "Drilling operations in waters of great depth and high currents – such as West Africa, the Gulf of Mexico, and offshore Brazil – demand the deployment of ultra-heavy riser strings. Deepwater buoyancy modules are also substantial in size and weight and are susceptible to impact and flexure damage caused by vessel motion and strong ocean currents.
"That's why we had to look at the development of a lower-density, lighter-weight material that would operate successfully beyond the 3,500 m (12,000 ft) previously offered."
Massively increased riser size
To give some perspective, drilling riser buoyancy module foams were originally developed more than 20 years ago for operation in relatively benign conditions (for example, a service depth of 1,524 m [5,000 ft] was once considered seriously deep), Balmoral Technical Director Dr. Robert Oram said.
Additionally, riser weights were far more modest in the past than is now the case.
Balmoral's technical and engineering teams were tasked with developing a lighter syntactic material, based on the original Durafloat system, for use at operational extremes of 4,000 m – typically 914 m to 1,524 m (3,000 ft to 5,000 ft) deeper than industry-standard drill riser buoyancy.
"We started the Superlite development program approximately 18 months ago following in-depth discussions with drilling contractors," Oram said. "From these discussions, it became increasingly obvious that exploration drilling would be moving beyond the then technical depth limit of approximately 12,000 ft within a two-to five-year timescale."
This was a major challenge for the technical and engineering R&D teams in Aberdeen.
"More than 30 years of technical development was required to achieve the existing standards of foam mechanical performance for depth ratings to 10,000 ft [3,000 m] and within a commercially-attractive system," Oram explained. "Pushing the envelope out to 15,000 ft required the identification and qualification of completely different foam buoyancy components. Patent applications have been lodged to cover the novel aspects of the new systems."
The new syntactic foams produced, Durafloat Super-lite and Durafloat Superlite-X, are rated to more than 4,000 m and are an extension to the company's existing Durafloat range.
Pushing the depth frontier
How much of a development leap was it to go beyond 3,500 m to the new capability of more than 4,000 m?
"Composite syntactic foams comprise three components – larger diameter, hollow composite spheres encapsulated in a 'matrix' of epoxy resin, which itself is filled with hollow glass microspheres," Oram said. "Pushing the depth frontier out from 12,000 ft to 15,000 ft without major increase in foam density required evaluation of the performance limitation of each component. The identified major areas of development involved both macrospheres and resin matrix: for composite macrospheres, a completely different resin reinforcement system had to be identified and qualified, whilst a new resin system had to be introduced to replace the existing system, which effectively 'ran out of steam' at 12,000 ft."
Recommended Reading
Exclusive: Permian’s Relevance in US Oil Production Expected to Increase
2024-11-26 - Jefferies’ Pete Bowden, the global head of industrial, energy and infrastructure investing, discussed the trajectory of the Permian Basin’s production and the future of M&A in the increasingly consolidated region, in this Hart Energy Exclusive interview.
Utica Oil Riches’ Biggest Challenge: Moving the Crude
2024-10-28 - Leslie Armentrout, the president and co-founder of Silver Cross Energy Partners discusses the opportunities of the Central Basin Platform and Utica—and the challenges.
Exclusive: Ring Focused on Drilling Tech to Boost Central Basin Economics
2024-10-31 - Ring Energy CEO Paul McKinney delves into the company’s ongoing efforts to grow its Central Basin Platform portfolio through acquisitions and betting on drilling and completions technology, in this Hart Energy Exclusive interview.
Shale Outlook Uinta: Horizontal Boom to Continue in 2025
2025-01-11 - After two large-scale transactions by SM Energy and Ovintiv, the Uinta Basin is ready for development—and stacked pay exploration.
PRB’s Sage Butte Ready for M&A Across Lower 48, Maybe Canada Too
2025-01-08 - Private E&P Sage Butte Energy, which operates in the Powder River Basin, is less interested in the Permian Basin, citing the cost of entry.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.