California lawmaker Ro Khanna introduced a bill into the U.S. House of Representatives on Dec. 13 that would prevent investors from securing carbon capture and sequestration tax credits if the carbon is used to boost oil production.
The bill has little chance of being adopted into law, but reflects deep political divisions in Congress over whether and how carbon capture can be used as a tool in the fight against climate change.
The tax credit, known as 45Q, allows companies to earn money for every ton of carbon that they capture off a polluting facility and store underground. That includes carbon injected into oil fields to push trapped oil out of the ground, something the industry calls EOR.
Khanna’s bill would revise 45Q by eliminating any credit for captured carbon used for EOR, which environmentalists say defeats the purpose of carbon capture by promoting the carbon-intensive fossil fuels industry.
Currently, 95% of carbon capture and storage (CCS) capacity in the U.S. is for EOR, according to data from the Global CCS Institute.
“We shouldn’t be subsidizing [EOR] if this is going to be increasing carbon,” Khanna told Reuters. “If the technology advances, we can consider it.”
The bill, titled the End Polluter Welfare for Enhanced Oil Recovery Act, is co-sponsored by Raul Grijalva of Arizona, chair of the House Natural Resources Committee, and Mike Quigley of Illinois, both Democrats like Khanna. It is supported by 20 green groups including Food & Water Watch, the Sierra Club and Sunrise Movement.
Khanna hopes the bill will be adopted into the Senate’s version of the Build Back Better Act (BBBA), the budget reconciliation bill. The House passed its version of the bill in November.
But the provision would be a significant departure from the House version, which includes a major expansion to the 45Q credit.
According to media reports, several senators, including West Virginia’s Joe Manchin, whose vote is needed to pass BBBA, have been discussing eliminating a provision of 45Q that requires facilities to capture at least 75% of their carbon emissions to qualify.
“They’re going the wrong way,” Khanna said of his Senate colleagues.
Recommended Reading
Matterhorn NatGas Pipeline Ramps Up Faster Than Expected
2024-10-22 - The Matterhorn Express natural gas pipeline has exceeded expectations since its ramp up on Oct. 1 for deliveries to interstate systems owned by Kinder Morgan, Williams and Enbridge.
Private Midstream Executives: More M&A, More Demand, More Gas Pricing Woes
2024-10-17 - Private midstream CEOs discuss the growth, opportunities and challenges that lie ahead.
Energy’s Election Stakes: Regulations, Bureaucracy, Permitting
2024-10-18 - Oil and Gas Investor assembled a group of seven oil and gas executives, policy advocates and other experts to talk about what’s really at stake in the November election and the many challenges facing the energy sector, regardless of who wins.
Energy Transfer Confirms La Porte Fire, Report of 'Unknown' Vehicle
2024-09-16 - Energy Transfer acknowledged reports of a vehicle striking a valve on a natural gas liquids line, potentially leading to a large fire in La Porte, Texas, on the morning of Sept. 16.
Matterhorn Express Ramps Up Natural Gas Flow
2024-10-04 - The Matterhorn Express Pipeline flowed 317 MMcf of natural gas to customers on Oct. 1, according to East Daley Analytics.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.