A group of Democratic U.S. senators on Aug. 4 unveiled legislation establishing a $500 billion fund to be financed by Big Oil and other “carbon polluters” that they hope to attach to broader climate control legislation expected later this year.
Modeled after the 1980 “Superfund” program in which polluters pay the costs of cleaning up hazardous substances from contaminated lands, the EPA and Treasury Department would identify the nation's largest “fossil fuel company polluters,” according to Senator Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.).
He said an estimated 25 to 30 of the biggest U.S.-based “polluters” would be required to contribute to the fund over 10 years. He did not identify individual companies that could be targeted.
Next week, Senate Democrats are expected to advance a budget plan that would be the precursor to a $3.5 trillion “human infrastructure” bill Congress would debate this fall.
The bill would include significant investments in programs to tackle climate change by reducing the release of CO₂ and other greenhouse gases into the atmosphere.
Republicans are likely to oppose the effort, prompting Democrats to employ a “budget reconciliation” effort that would let them pass such a bill through the Senate by a simple majority in the 100-member chamber, instead of the 60 votes needed for most legislation.
During a press conference to unveil the legislation, Van Hollen, along with fellow Democratic Senators Edward Markey and Sheldon Whitehouse, did not assess their chances of winning the support of all 48 Senate Democrats and two independents for their initiative.
Asked whether one of the most moderate Senate Democrats, Joe Manchin of coal-producing West Virginia, could be won over, Van Hollen said only that the two would discuss the “Polluters Pay Climate Fund” idea.
The fund would not be instead of a possible carbon tax or other steps aimed at reducing carbon emissions, according to the senators.
“It is a fixed penalty to provide a block of compensation,” Whitehouse said, to “clean up the mess that they knowingly cause.”
Recommended Reading
E&Ps Pivot from the Pricey Permian
2025-02-01 - SM Energy, Ovintiv and Devon Energy were rumored to be hunting for Permian M&A—but they ultimately inked deals in cheaper basins. Experts say it’s a trend to watch as producers shrug off high Permian prices for runway in the Williston, Eagle Ford, the Uinta and the Montney.
Analysis: Middle Three Forks Bench Holds Vast Untapped Oil Potential
2025-01-07 - Williston Basin operators have mostly landed laterals in the shallower upper Three Forks bench. But the deeper middle Three Forks contains hundreds of millions of barrels of oil yet to be recovered, North Dakota state researchers report.
Formentera Joins EOG in Wildcatting South Texas’ Oily Pearsall Pay
2025-01-22 - Known in the past as a “heartbreak shale,” Formentera Partners is counting on bigger completions and longer laterals to crack the Pearsall code, Managing Partner Bryan Sheffield said. EOG Resources is also exploring the shale.
Expand Lands 5.6-Miler in Appalachia in Five Days With One Bit Run
2025-03-11 - Expand Energy reported its Shannon Fields OHI #3H in northern West Virginia was drilled with just one bit run in some 30,000 ft.
Ring May Drill—or Sell—Barnett, Devonian Assets in Eastern Permian
2025-03-07 - Ring Energy could look to drill—or sell—Barnett and Devonian horizontal locations on the eastern side of the Permian’s Central Basin Platform. Major E&Ps are testing and tinkering on Barnett well designs nearby.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.