U.S. Well Services filed a patent infringement lawsuit against rival Halliburton Co. and shale oil producer Cimarex Energy Co. on April 15, alleging they infringed its electric fracking patents.
The lawsuit, which seeks unspecified damages and costs, alleges Halliburton’s all-electric fracturing fleet violates several of U.S. Well Services’ patents for electric pumps and pumping systems and monitoring and control systems.
Halliburton said it had just received the lawsuit and was reviewing it. Cimarex Energy did not immediately reply to a request for comment.
The action comes as electric fracking, or e-frac as it is often called, has won greater interest among oil and gas producers seeking to reduce carbon emissions. The technology uses natural gas or the grid to power hydraulic fracturing equipment.
There are a handful of oilfield service companies that own and operate e-frac equipment, including U.S. Well Services and rival Evolution Well Services. E-frac fleets can be costly to build—running up to $60 million apiece compared with as little as $30 million for diesel-powered systems.
Halliburton CEO Jeff Miller had said the company would be “slow” to move on the technology because of its cost. In January, however, Halliburton said it had deployed the industry’s first grid-powered fracturing system for Cimarex Energy in the Permian Basin, the top U.S. shale field.
There are fewer than 20 electric frac spreads in the U.S., according to consultancy Primary Vision, representing a fraction of the 206 active frac fleets. U.S. Well Services is running five e-frac spreads, while Evolution Well Services runs seven, according to Primary Vision.
Other hydraulic pumping firms, such as NexTier Oilfield Solutions Inc. and ProPetro Holding Corp., are also exploring the technology, they have said.
One industry observer said e-frac providers are also in greater demand as their technology has been shown to be effective. “They’re showing the efficiencies that were promised with e-frac—and they’re finally manifesting” cost and environmental benefits, said George O’Leary, managing director at Tudor, Pickering, Holt & Co.
The case is U.S. Well Services versus Halliburton, Cimarex Energy, U.S. District Court for Western District of Texas, No. 21-cv-00367.
Recommended Reading
EIA: NatGas Storage Withdrawal Eclipses 300 Bcf
2025-01-30 - The U.S. Energy Information Administration’s storage report failed to lift natural gas prices, which have spent the week on a downturn.
EIA: NatGas Storage Plunges, Prices Soar
2025-01-16 - Frigid weather and jumping LNG demand have pushed natural gas above $4/MMBtu.
NatGas in Storage Shows YOY Drop for First Time Since 2022
2025-01-03 - Despite a drop in gas in storage, prices took a hit from forecasts of warmer-than-expected weather.
NatGas Rally Reaches 2024 Peak, Highest Price in Two Years
2024-12-19 - Analysts say the gas market remains volatile as prices surpass $3.50/MMbtu at the Henry Hub for the first time in about two years.
EIA Reports Larger-Than-Expected NatGas Withdrawal, Again
2025-02-20 - The storage drop failed to offset warmer forecasts, as natural gas prices dipped following a three-week rally.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.