data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34822/34822f10499c348d77aa4e72f3bbf3f89fb8cb11" alt="oil prices"
The price of Brent crude ended the week at $82.78 after closing the previous week at $85.83. (Source: Shutterstock)
The price of Brent crude ended the week at $72.97 after closing the previous week at $82.78. The price of WTI ended the week at $66.74 after closing the previous week at $76.68. The significant decline in crude prices was the reaction to the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) and the concerns about the stability of the financial sector.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84cef/84cef647775e42a2318f963b95081d16ebb78256" alt="WAOP"
Last week, we reiterated one of our long-held concerns pertaining to the Federal Reserve being too aggressive in shifting to a tightening monetary policy and subsequently pushing the economy into a recession either through demand destruction or through a breakdown somewhere within the financial sector, which would then undermine the real economy. This concern stems from our view that the Federal Reserve has limited ability to address the root causes of the current inflation, which is not being driven by wage growth, but more so from supply-side factors. The recent collapse of the Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) is indirectly related to aggressive rate increases that have been implemented by the Federal Reserve. The bank was caught holding a portfolio of long-term Treasury bonds, which diminished in value because of the rate increases, at the same time the rate increases were negatively impacting the bank’s client base. While the Federal Reserve, the U.S. Treasury and the FDIC came up with a solution to protect the funds of the depositors and to keep the bank operating, the concerns about the financial sector are spreading. Over the weekend Credit Suisse had to be taken over by UBS with Credit Suisse facing significant withdrawals by depositors.
The Federal Reserve (and to a less extend the ECB) has gotten into a jam by raising interest rates very quickly in an attempt to squelch inflation after running with accommodating monetary policies for an extended period of time. Now the Federal Reserve is facing a dilemma:
- Increase rates so as to remain consistent with stated views that higher interest rates are the solution to inflation and placing further stress on the financial sector (including the smaller, regional banks, which provide a material amount of lending to businesses, commercial and residential real estate and consumers), which will ultimately affect the overall U.S. economy along with putting further pressure on emerging markets.
- Changing course and pausing the rate increases and risking the loss of credibility, which will result in heightened concerns about the U.S. inflation outlook and the resulting impact on the overall U.S. economy. We were expecting that the Federal Reserve at its next meeting scheduled for March 21-22 will raise rates by 0.25% in an attempt to take the middle ground and give something to the inflation hawks, as well as those worried about the stability of the financial sector and the U.S. economy slipping into a recession.
Additionally, we are expecting that OPEC+ will monitor the banking issues in the west along with China’s economy now that it has moved away from its zero-COVID policies and the impact on oil demand before making any changes to their supply strategy. However, we also expect OPEC+ will make additional cuts, when warranted, to support oil prices.
Given the remaining concerns about the financial sector and the overall economy, we are expecting that oil prices will be under further pressure this week, but the price of Brent has support around $70.00 and the price of WTI has support around $65.00. As such, we think it will take some other unexpected bad news to break below these levels.
For a complete forecast of refined products and prices, please refer to our Short-term Outlook.
About the Author: John E. Paise, president of Stratas Advisors, is responsible for managing the research and consulting business worldwide. Prior to joining Stratas Advisors, Paisie was a partner with PFC Energy, a strategic consultancy based in Washington, D.C., where he led a global practice focused on helping clients (including IOCs, NOC, independent oil companies and governments) to understand the future market environment and competitive landscape, set an appropriate strategic direction and implement strategic initiatives. He worked more than eight years with IBM Consulting (formerly PriceWaterhouseCoopers, PwC Consulting) as an associate partner in the strategic change practice focused on the energy sector while residing in Houston, Singapore, Beijing and London.
Recommended Reading
Q&A: Pearl Energy Investments Rides the Downturns for 250% ROI
2025-02-25 - Billy Quinn, founder and managing director of Pearl Energy Investments, leads a team that thrives amid the oil and gas investment cycles.
Slant Energy Secures Capital Commitment from Pearl Energy Investments
2025-02-25 - Newly formed Slant Energy III LLC has secured an equity commitment from Dallas-based private equity firm Pearl Energy Investments.
Chevron Makes Leadership, Organizational Changes in Bid to Simplify
2025-02-24 - Chevron Corp. is consolidating its oil, products and gas organization into two segments: upstream and downstream, midstream and chemicals.
Baker Hughes Appoints Ahmed Moghal to CFO
2025-02-24 - Ahmed Moghal is taking over as CFO of Baker Hughes following Nancy Buese’s departure from the position.
Dividends Declared Week of Feb. 17
2025-02-21 - 2024 year-end earnings season is underway. Here is a compilation of dividends declared from select upstream, midstream, downstream and service and supply companies.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.