Australia's Woodside Energy and Santos said on Feb. 7 they had ended merger talks to create a possible $52 billion global oil and gas giant, and Santos flagged it would look for other ways to bolster its value.
Woodside, which is more than twice as large as Santos by revenue and market capitalization, said it would only pursue a deal that would clearly benefit its shareholders.
Santos shares fell nearly 9% after the announcement and closed down 5.8% while Woodside's stock ended up 0.5%.
The talks, first announced in December, fell apart as the two companies could not agree on a valuation level, according to two sources with direct knowledge of the matter who could not be named discussing confidential information.
A firm bid did not emerge from Woodside following the almost two months of due diligence and negotiations that the parties undertook, one of the sources said.
Woodside declined to comment on those points and Santos did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Santos said in a statement that after "an initial exchange of information, sufficient combination benefits were not identified to support a merger that would be in the best interests of Santos shareholders".
If the merger had taken place, it would have created a major global LNG producer that could attract more offshore investors as gas is seen as a key bridging fuel in the shift to cleaner energy.
"While the discussions with Santos did not result in a transaction, Woodside considers that the global LNG sector provides significant potential for value creation," Woodside CEO Meg O’Neill said in a statement.
Woodside had faced pressure from some investors not to pay a premium for Santos in what would have been one of the largest corporate takeovers in Australian history.
"Woodside's decision to walk away is a relief," said Simon Mawhinney, chief investment officer at Allan Gray, which holds about $456 million worth of Woodside stock. The fund last week wrote to management warning against pursuing a deal.
"We had hoped this would be the outcome," Mawhinney said. "It was unclear to us where there was much merit in a tie up."
For Woodside, this is the second time in just over eight years that it has ditched a deal that would have given it gas assets in Papua New Guinea, prized for their low production costs and proximity to big LNG buyers in north Asia.
Recommended Reading
Segrist: American LNG Unaffected by Cut-Off of Russian Gas Supply
2025-02-24 - The last gas pipeline connecting Russia to Western Europe has shut down, but don’t expect a follow-on effect for U.S. LNG demand.
Bottlenecks Holding US Back from NatGas, LNG Dominance
2025-03-13 - North America’s natural gas abundance positions the region to be a reliable power supplier. But regulatory factors are holding the industry back from fully tackling the global energy crisis, experts at CERAWeek said.
What's Affecting Oil Prices This Week? (March 31, 2025)
2025-03-31 - For the upcoming week, Stratas Advisors predict that the price of Brent crude will move sideways and struggle amid concerns and uncertainties about the impact of the tariffs imposed by the Trump Administration.
Charif Souki Plans Third US NatGas Venture, Including E&P Team
2025-03-25 - Charif Souki, co-founder of the Lower 48’s first and largest LNG exporter, has his sights set on a third natural gas venture after his exit from Tellurian Inc.
EIA: NatGas Storage Withdrawal Misses Forecasts by 20 Nearly Bcf
2025-01-23 - Natural gas prices fell following the release of the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s weekly storage report showing a near-20 Bcf miss on analysts’ expectations.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.