With more than 10 trillion barrels (Tbbl) of oil shale resources in place and advancing conversion technologies present, the outlook for development of this unconventional resource appears good, according to Khosrow Biglarbigi. There is a caveat that rises above the rest, however: the price of oil.
Speaking during a Society of Petroleum Engineers webinar, Biglarbigi, the president and director of petroleum engineering for INTEK Inc., said that for any project to work the economics must fall into place.
Oil shale is a carbonate rock containing kerogen. If the rock is heated to between 371 C and 426.7 C (700 F and 800 F), it goes through a chemical decomposition process called pyrolysis—in the absence of oxygen—and a vapor is formed, he explained. With upgrading, the vapor is condensed into liquid and then upgraded to synthetic crude.
“For this resource to be developed, it must compete with the other conventional and unconventional oil and gas resources at prevailing market conditions. The key driver to all of this is the oil price,” Biglarbigi said. The minimum economic price for oil shale to yield a rate of return of 15%—not profit but to cover the risks—varies depending on the type of technology.
For true in situ projects, Biglarbigi said the economic price is about $50/bbl. For hybrid technology, it’s about $60/bbl, compared to about $62 for surface mining and $75/bbl for underground mining. He noted that the costs are for first-generation plants.
Biglarbigi said he doesn’t see any challenges to developing oil shale that cannot be fixed if the economics are right.
“For surface retorting, the scalability is a major issue,” he said, noting that plants that are producing are not yet doing so on a commercial scale. “That’s concerning. Hopefully, with some of the hybrid technology and in situ technology we can work around the scaling issue.”
Additional challenges include water rights, water runoff, groundwater protection and water availability; between 1 bbl and 3 bbl of water are needed per 1 bbl of oil shale.
The other challenge has to do with the market, he said, using the U.S. as an example. America’s oil shale deposits are heavily concentrated in Utah, Colorado and Wyoming, which are believed to have 2 Tbbl of the 6 Tbbl of oil shale in the U.S. But attention is now focused on shale oil and shale gas, he said.
Recommended Reading
Shale Outlook Eagle Ford: Sustaining the Long Plateau in South Texas
2025-01-08 - The Eagle Ford lacks the growth profile of the Permian Basin, but thoughtful M&A and refrac projects are extending operator inventories.
Six New Dean Wildcats Come With 95% Oil in Northern Midland Basin
2025-02-21 - SM Energy reported geologic variability in deposition in the new play in southern Dawson County, Texas, but “it's really competitive.”
PRB’s Sage Butte Ready for M&A Across Lower 48, Maybe Canada Too
2025-01-08 - Private E&P Sage Butte Energy, which operates in the Powder River Basin, is less interested in the Permian Basin, citing the cost of entry.
Birch Resources Mows Dean Sandstone for 6.5 MMbbl in 15 Months
2025-01-06 - Birch Resources has averaged 7 MMboe, 92% oil, from just 16 wells in the northern Midland Basin’s Dean Formation in an average of 15 months each, according to new Texas Railroad Commission data.
DUCs Fly the Coop: Big Drawdowns from the Midland to Haynesville
2025-02-14 - The Midland Basin depleted its inventory of excess DUCs the most last year, falling from two months of runway to one during the past year, according to a report by Enverus Intelligence Research.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.