Chesapeake Energy Corp. on June 29 sought bankruptcy court approval to cancel $311 million in pipeline contracts, setting up a battle with U.S. regulators and operators including Energy Transfer LP, according to court filings.
On June 28, Chesapeake became the largest U.S. oil and gas producer to seek bankruptcy protection in at least five years, falling to heavy debt and the impact of the coronavirus outbreak on energy markets.
The company separately said in a filing it plans to operate six to eight drilling rigs for the next two years, about half the 14 rigs active on average in the first quarter, as it battles a historic downturn in oil prices.
The shale pioneer wants to walk away from contracts with units of Energy Transfer, Boardwalk Pipelines Partners LP and a Crestwood Equity Partners LP and Consolidated Edison Inc. gas joint venture. The contracts involve about $293 million with Energy Transfer's Tiger Pipeline and $18 million with Boardwalk's Gulf South Pipeline.
Neither Energy Transfer, Boardwalk nor Chesapeake responded to a request for comment.
U.S. pipeline regulator, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), last week barred Chesapeake from altering its agreement with Energy Transfer and is set to weigh similar requests from Gulf South and from Stagecoach Pipeline & Storage Co., owned by Crestwood Equity Partners and Consolidated Edison.
Crestwood said it is positioned to maintain operations for Chesapeake, including its Stagecoach unit. However, Chesapeake must show any rejection benefits the public good for FERC to approve it, a Crestwood spokesman said.
Cancelling the contracts are key to winning creditors' consent of its debt restructuring, Chesapeake told U.S. Bankruptcy court Judge David Jones in a filing.
The battle could represent a turning point in energy bankruptcies, said Matthew Lewis, director at pipeline research firm East Daley Capital, with FERC seeking equal footing with interstate pipeline contracts.
If FERC is "less liberal with contract rejection, it could force more renegotiations of contracts," instead of outright cancellations, Lewis said.
Recommended Reading
After BKV’s IPO, Is Market Open to More Public SMID Caps?
2024-10-03 - The market for new E&P and energy IPOs has been tepid since the COVID-19 pandemic. But investor appetite is growing for new small- and mid-sized energy IPOs, says Citigroup Managing Director Dylan Tornay.
Quantum’s VanLoh: New ‘Wave’ of Private Equity Investment Unlikely
2024-10-10 - Private equity titan Wil VanLoh, founder of Quantum Capital Group, shares his perspective on the dearth of oil and gas exploration, family office and private equity funding limitations and where M&A is headed next.
Exclusive: How E&Ps Yearning Capital can Stand Out to Family Offices
2024-10-15 - 3P Energy Capital’s Founder and Managing Partner Christina Kitchens shares insight on the “educational process” of operators looking at opportunities in the U.S. and how E&Ps looking for capital can interest family offices, in this Hart Energy Exclusive interview.
Cibolo Energy Closes Fund Aimed at Upstream, Midstream Growth
2024-09-10 - Cibolo Energy Management LLC closed its second fund, Cibolo Energy Partners II LP, meant to boost middle market upstream and midstream companies’ growth with development capital.
ABS Market for Upstream Producers Expanding, Panelists Say
2024-10-09 - Asset-backed securitization or ABS, which transforms oil and gas reserves into negotiable financial assets, usually have a hedging element and offer producers another financing option, panelists said Oct. 3 at Hart Energy’s Energy Capital Conference in Dallas.