Canada’s decision to buy Kinder Morgan Canada Ltd.’s Trans Mountain pipeline was brought about by a “particularly problematic” situation and is not a symbol of how things get done in the country, the finance minister said on May 30.
Canada on May 29 agreed to buy the pipeline for C$4.5 billion (US$3.5 billion) in an effort to save a project that faces formidable opposition from environmentalists and British Columbia officials worried the pipeline could spill heavy oil.
Finance Minister Bill Morneau said the decision was exceptional and that the rule of law needs to be seen as a business advantage to investing in Canada.
“We don’t see this as a symbol of the way to get things done in this country,” Morneau told a business audience in Calgary, home to Canada’s energy industry. He was briefly interrupted by several anti-pipeline protesters.
But Perrin Beatty, chief executive of the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, said the government needs to revamp the “badly broken” regulatory system for major energy projects. He said the Liberal government’s planned reforms are not sufficient to preclude the repeat of another situation like Trans Mountain.
“We have to have a system where it’s possible to get an answer and where it’s possible to act on that answer,” Beatty said. “What we’ve been getting in Canada is decision by delay.”
Morneau said that while the government will listen to bidders for the pipeline in the short-term, its sale will depend on being certain that it will get built.
Ottawa has said it does not intend to own the project in the long-term.
Morneau reiterated that multiple potential investors have approached the government. He gave no specifics, though he said pension funds and aboriginal groups have approached him personally.
The planned expansion of Trans Mountain would nearly triple the capacity, running from Alberta’s oil sands to the Pacific province of British Columbia, which is opposed to the project. The federal government has repeatedly said the project is in the national interest.
But opposition in British Columbia threaten to further delay the project, which was approved by the federal government in 2016.
British Columbia’s Premier John Horgan told broadcaster Global News on Wednesday that he “rejected” the idea that his relationship with the federal government has deteriorated over the dispute.
“We disagree on one issue,” Horgan said.
Recommended Reading
Utica Oil E&P Infinity Natural Resources’ IPO Gains 7 More Bankers
2024-11-27 - Infinity Natural Resources’ IPO is expected to provide a first-look at the public market’s valuation of the Utica oil play.
ConocoPhillips Hits Permian, Eagle Ford Records as Marathon Closing Nears
2024-11-01 - ConocoPhillips anticipates closing its $17.1 billion acquisition of Marathon Oil before year-end, adding assets in the Eagle Ford, the Bakken and the Permian Basin.
Exxon, Chevron Beat 3Q Estimates, Output Boosts Results
2024-11-01 - Oil giants Chevron and Exxon Mobil reported mixed results for the third quarter, with both companies surpassing Wall Street expectations despite facing different challenges.
Chevron Targets Up to $8B in Free Cash Flow Growth Next Year, CEO Says
2025-01-08 - The No. 2 U.S. oil producer expects results to benefit from the start of new or expanded oil production projects in Kazakhstan, U.S. shale and the offshore U.S. Gulf of Mexico.
Twenty Years Ago, Range Jumpstarted the Marcellus Boom
2024-11-06 - Range Resources launched the Appalachia shale rush, and rising domestic power and LNG demand can trigger it to boom again.