U.S. oil and gas producer Chesapeake Energy Corp.'s Chapter 11 bankruptcy plan was approved by a U.S. judge on Jan. 13, giving lenders control of the firm and ending a contentious trial.
Chesapeake will emerge from bankruptcy with about $3 billion in new financing, a $7 billion reduction in debt, and $1.7 billion cut from gas processing and pipeline costs.
Investors who committed last spring to back the restructuring as energy tumbled stand to benefit enormously. A rebound in energy prices raised Chesapeake's value to about $5.13 billion, the judge hearing the case said.
Once the second-largest U.S. natural gas producer, Chesapeake filed for court protection last June, reeling from overspending on assets and from a sudden decline in demand and prices spurred by the coronavirus pandemic.
Creditors who opposed the plan claimed Chesapeake was bankrupt long before it sought court protection and harshly criticized terms that gave backers including mutual fund giant Franklin Advisers Inc. heady returns.
First-lien note holders stand to get a 130% return on their claims and Franklin 41%, but unsecured creditors will only recover about 4%, said Robert Stack, who represented unsecured creditors. The plan improperly favors a few at the expense of many, he said. His remarks drew a rebuke from bankruptcy court Judge David Jones.
Chesapeake managers "should not be criticized," said Jones, "they should be complimented," citing the energy market crash. "I reject the assertion that people threw caution to the wind."
The plan will allow Chesapeake to emerge "a stronger and more competitive enterprise," spokesman Gordon Pennoyer said.
RELATED:
Chesapeake Energy Worth $5.13 Billion on Bankruptcy Exit, Judge Says
Jones refused to consider a last minute offer by an investment group led by Jefferies Financial Group to replace the financing that gave first-lien and Franklin heady returns.
At the same time, Jones acknowledged his decision to allocate a significant number of share-rights to Franklin and others in exchange for their financing provided what he called a "good deal."
"I might have made a different decision with the benefit of hindsight," Jones said. "The fact of the matter is I didn't."
Recommended Reading
Lower Prices Spell Lower Oil Growth from Permian, US Shale: EIA
2024-10-09 - The U.S. Energy Information Administration reduced its forecasts for WTI oil prices and Lower 48 oil production growth in its latest Short-Term Energy Outlook report.
Permian Trends Continue to Point to Crude Growth
2024-11-20 - Smaller, more creative M&A deals are becoming the standard in the Permian’s Midland and Delaware basins, an Enverus analyst says.
Hurricane Francine Shuts in Quarter of GoM Oil, Gas Production
2024-09-11 - The Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement reported that 130 platforms and several rigs were affected as the storm approached the Louisiana coast.
EPA Gives OK to Texas GulfLink Deepwater Port
2024-11-04 - Sentinel Midstream’s Texas GulfLink project is one of several proposals for an offshore oil terminal in the Gulf.
Power Players: Riley Permian Natgas, Conduit Electrifying Permian
2024-11-26 - Riley Permian and Conduit Power are working together to use natural gas to power the Permian Basin and ERCOT.