A U.S. Bankruptcy judge said on July 27 that she would approve Sabine Oil & Gas Corp.'s plan of reorganization, which would clear the way for the Texas energy producer to exit Chapter 11 after a year-long battle with its creditors.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Shelley Chapman in Manhattan said at a status conference on July 27 that she would approve the plan and was working on an opinion that would explain her reasoning, according to her courtroom deputy, Greg White.
Sabine's plan cuts the company's debt to $350 million from $2.8 billion, with its lenders ending up with almost all of the company's stock when Sabine emerges from bankruptcy.
Unsecured creditors of the Houston-based company will get a sliver of the company's stock and warrants, amounting to pennies on the dollar for the $1.4 billion the creditors said they were owed.
The case has been unusually contentious, with Sabine and its lenders squaring off against the official committee of unsecured creditors, led by Aurelius Capital Management, a firm which spent years battling Argentina over its defaulted bonds.
Sabine's plan of reorganization was premised on settling disagreements with its lenders that turned on the question of the value of the lenders' collateral. The creditors' committee said Sabine would have been better off litigating against its lenders rather than settling.
One bankruptcy lawyer said similar fault lines are developing in several of the dozens of pending bankruptcies involving energy producers.
"I think you'll see it in more [energy] cases where unsecured creditors, who may not receive anything, are attempting to use any leverage they can to create any value they can for themselves," said Barney Given, a bankruptcy lawyer with Loeb & Loeb. He was not involved in the Sabine case.
Falling energy prices have undermined the value of reserves that many producers borrowed against, leaving banks nursing unexpected losses and unsecured creditors struggling to get repaid anything.
The fighting within Sabine may not be over. Lenders plan to contest the fees paid to lawyers and advisers for the creditors' committee, according to court documents.
In March, Chapman ruled that Sabine could shed certain pipeline contracts, upending a long-held view by midstream operators that their agreements to gather and transport natural gas were bankruptcy-proof.
Recommended Reading
US Court Overturns Alaska Oil Lease Sale in a Win for Environmentalists
2024-07-17 - The ruling affects a lease sale held in December 2022 of offshore tracts for oil and gas development in the Cook Inlet in the northern Gulf of Alaska.
Bipartisan Bill Aims to Speed Up Permitting Bureaucracy
2024-07-23 - If passed, the new rules would tackle litigation delays for energy projects across all sectors, an analyst says.
New FERC Commissioner Calls Slow Permitting Process ‘Huge Problem’
2024-09-17 - FERC Commissioner David Rosner said the commission is aware that the permitting process is too slow overall at Gastech Houston 2024.
Supreme Court’s Uinta Basin Rail Case Raises Stakes for LNG, Pipelines
2024-07-10 - The lawsuit, involving crude transport via railway in the Uinta Basin, is part of a larger intragovernmental fight that could have implications for how FERC decides pipeline and LNG plant permitting.
FERC Re-affirms Tellurian Extension Request for Driftwood LNG
2024-07-09 - The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission upheld its earlier decision following the Sierra Club’s request for another hearing on Driftwood LNG’s 2029 completion date.