More than two dozen oil companies have weighed in on whether Canada's energy regulator should intervene in Enbridge Inc's contentious proposal to overhaul shipping contracts on its Mainline pipeline network.
The Mainline is North America's largest pipeline system, shipping around 3 million barrels per day (MMbbl/d) of crude from western Canada to the U.S. Midwest. Enbridge currently allocates capacity based on monthly nominations from shippers, but is proposing to switch to long-term fixed-volume contracts.
The company launched a two-month open season to solicit bids for space on Aug. 2. It faces stiff opposition from many Canadian producers, who say the tolls are unfair and the changes will limit their access to markets.
After complaints from companies, including Suncor Energy and Canadian Natural Resources Ltd, the Canada Energy Regulator (CER) said it would hold a fast-track process to gather comment and gave interested parties a deadline of 12 p.m. local time on Sept. 5.
Most written responses came from parties in favor of the regulator intervening before the end of the open season. They included MEG Energy Corp, the Saskatchewan government and the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP).
The CER requested comment on whether it should consider the terms and tolls offered by Enbridge before - instead of after - the end of the open season, and whether the open season should be delayed.
CAPP underlined the importance of the Mainline system to Canadian producers.
"The conversion of the Mainline ... is no small thing and it should perhaps be no surprise and certainly no shame to anyone if the attempt to achieve the conversion by confidential negotiations and an open season turned out to be insufficient to the magnitude of the task," Nick Schultz, CAPP's vice president of pipeline regulation, said in a letter.
Enbridge has been negotiating with shippers since last year but the terms and tolls on offer have not been publicly disclosed. The company has until Sept. 11 to file comment with the CER and welcomed the letters of support for its Mainline proposal from a number of shippers.
"We are pleased that a range of customers have submitted letters to the CER today in support of what we are doing," said Guy Jarvis, Enbridge's executive vice president of liquids pipelines.
Companies opposed to any intervention by the CER include refiners Marathon Petroleum Corp and Motiva Enterprises .
Oil sands producers Cenovus Energy and Imperial Oil, which is majority-owned by ExxonMobil Corp, also supported the Mainline changes.
"Cenovus is in favor of contract carriage or firm service on the Enbridge Mainline. This will provide volume certainty for shippers to downstream markets," Chief Executive Alex Pourbaix wrote.
Recommended Reading
Federal Regulators Give Venture Global Permission to Introduce Natural Gas Into LNG Plant
2024-11-06 - Federal regulators have given Venture Global LNG permission to introduce natural gas into its Plaquemines export plant in Louisiana.
Electricity and LNG Drive Midstream Growth as M&A Looms
2024-09-26 - The midstream sector sees surging global and domestic demand with fewer players left to offer ‘wellhead to water’ services.
Matterhorn NatGas Pipeline Ramps Up Faster Than Expected
2024-10-22 - The Matterhorn Express natural gas pipeline has exceeded expectations since its ramp up on Oct. 1 for deliveries to interstate systems owned by Kinder Morgan, Williams and Enbridge.
Williams Files for Temporary Permit to Keep $950MM Project Online
2024-09-11 - A temporary emergency certificate is necessary for Williams to continue operating the Regional Energy Access Project after the Court of Appeals shot down an original FERC certificate in July.
Entergy Picks Cresent Midstream to Develop $1B CCS for Gas-fired Power Plant
2024-09-20 - Crescent will work with SAMSUNG E&A and Honeywell on the project.