In Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy newest report, "U.S. Energy Policy FAQ: The U.S. Energy Mix, National Security and the Myths of Energy Independence," the leading causes of higher oil prices are enumerated. Three are often cited by industry members and commentators: OPEC production restraint, limited new non-OPEC supply, and fears of supply interruption (war, terrorism, weather, Chavez). Probably the greatest contributor to higher oil prices this decade is the weakening U.S. dollar, however. The report's authors, Amy Myers Jaffe, Kenneth Medlock and Lauren Smulcer, estimate US$92 oil is the new US$60, as crude oil is traded globally in U.S. dollars. "The U.S. dollar has fallen by more than 50% relative to the euro since 2000, and major oil-exporting countries, such as the Persian Gulf countries, buy a substantial portion of their imports from European Union countries. Thus, in order for the Persian Gulf countries to simply stay even, the price of oil denominated in dollars must rise by more than 50% as well," they report. "A very rudimentary calculation can highlight the effect of the weakening dollar further: If the U.S. dollar/euro exchange rate today was at the same level as in December 2000, the price of oil would be roughly the equivalent of around $60 per barrel. While this is substantially higher than the prices seen in the 1990s, it is still much lower than the $90-$100 oil prices we see today." Here's the full report: bakerinstituteanalysisofenergybillfeb2008.pdf The following is pure conjecture on my part, and I am told that the idea makes sense but the net logic is wrong. What do you think? The disparity is to the advantage of U.S. oil companies that produce and sell oil at home, as well as those that produce and sell abroad and bring the net profit home. When ExxonMobil produces and sells a barrel from the North Sea to local markets at US$100, and if its net profit is 40%, it has US$40 to spend at home (or give back to shareholders) and this $40 is actually worth US$40. When BP produces and sells a barrel from the North Sea for US$100, and its margin is 40%, it has US$40 that works like US$27 in Europe. Meanwhile, ExxonMobil nets US$40 from its production from the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, and BP takes home the equivalent of US$27. This math suggests U.S.-based producers should be redeploying their profits at home. --Nissa Darbonne, Executive Editor, Oil and Gas Investor, A&D Watch and Oil and Gas Investor This Week, ndarbonne@hartenergy.com
Recommended Reading
Energy Transfer Signs First Deal to Supply Data Center with NatGas
2025-02-10 - Energy Transfer LP agreed to provide up to 450,000 MMBtu/d of natural gas to CloudBurst Data Centers Inc.’s flagship AI-focused development in Central Texas.
What's Affecting Oil Prices This Week? (Feb. 10, 2025)
2025-02-10 - President Trump calls for members of OPEC+ and U.S. shale producers to supply more oil to push down oil prices to the neighborhood of $45/bbl.
Expand CFO: ‘Durable’ LNG, Not AI, to Drive US NatGas Demand
2025-02-07 - About three-quarters of future U.S. gas demand growth will be fueled by LNG exports, while data centers’ needs will be more muted, according to Expand Energy CFO Mohit Singh.
AltaGas, Keyera Come to Mutual Agreements to Leverage Infrastructure
2025-02-07 - Canadian midstream companies AltaGas and Keyera have signed mutually beneficial, long-term contracts for NGLs and fractionation.
LNG, Data Centers, Winter Freeze Offer Promise for NatGas in ‘25
2025-02-06 - New LNG export capacity and new gas-fired power demand have prices for 2025 gas and beyond much higher than the early 2024 outlook expected. And kicking the year off: a 21-day freeze across the U.S.