When is a road a road? Or, is a road a road a road? To be a road, or not to be a road? That was the question.
In a federal court, the pipeline won. The “road” lost.
A federal court of appeals has issued a first ruling on Pres. Bill Clinton’s “Roadless Rule” involving a pipeline project—and the pipeline project has won—says Poe Leggette, attorney with Fulbright & Jaworski LLP. The appellate court has agreed with a district court’s denial of environmentalists’ claim that trucks moving in and out of an area in central Colorado to build a pipeline de facto create a road, thus the rule applies.
The case is Wilderness Workshop v. Bureau of Land Management, No. 08-1165.
“This is the first ruling by any federal court of appeals on the application of the ‘roadless rule’ to pipeline construction,” Leggette says. He reports a summary of the ruling in the firm’s monthly “Fulbright Western Lands & Energy Monthly Update” newsletter.
“The chief issue before the court was whether the project proponent’s use of motorized equipment to lay the pipeline made the pipeline right of way a ‘motor vehicle travelway,’ a term used in the ‘roadless rule’ to define what a ‘road’ is.”
The BLM and U.S. Forest Service were on the pipeline’s side in this case, saying vehicles along the pipeline route made that route a road merely for purposes of construction.
“The court reviewed the agencies’ position to see whether it was ‘plainly inconsistent’ with the text of the ‘roadless rule,’” he says.
The preamble of the ‘roadless rule’ in the federal legislation, though, says roadless areas are not the same as wilderness areas “and would remain open for many activities, including ‘motorized uses.’”
Leggette says, “The court also rejected the argument of the environmental organizations that the environmental-impact statement for the pipeline should have treated all future wells that could be connected to the pipeline as ‘connected actions’ under the National Environmental Policy Act.”
For more on this, Leggette can be reached at pleggette@fulbright.com.
–Nissa Darbonne, Executive Editor, Oil and Gas Investor, A&D Watch, OilandGasInvestor.com; ndarbonne@hartenergy.comRecommended Reading
Utica Oil’s Infinity IPO Values its Play at $48,000 per Boe/d
2025-01-30 - Private-equity-backed Infinity Natural Resources’ IPO pricing on Jan. 30 gives a first look into market valuation for Ohio’s new tight-oil Utica play. Public trading is to begin the morning of Jan. 31.
Exxon Slips After Flagging Weak 4Q Earnings on Refining Squeeze
2025-01-08 - Exxon Mobil shares fell nearly 2% in early trading on Jan. 8 after the top U.S. oil producer warned of a decline in refining profits in the fourth quarter and weak returns across its operations.
What's Affecting Oil Prices This Week? (Feb. 3, 2025)
2025-02-03 - The Trump administration announced a 10% tariff on Canadian crude exports, but Stratas Advisors does not think the tariffs will have any material impact on Canadian oil production or exports to the U.S.
Chevron Targets Up to $8B in Free Cash Flow Growth Next Year, CEO Says
2025-01-08 - The No. 2 U.S. oil producer expects results to benefit from the start of new or expanded oil production projects in Kazakhstan, U.S. shale and the offshore U.S. Gulf of Mexico.
Utica’s Infinity Natural Resources Seeks $1.2B Valuation with IPO
2025-01-21 - Appalachian Basin oil and gas producer Infinity Natural Resources plans to sell 13.25 million shares at a public purchase price between $18 and $21 per share—the latest in a flurry of energy-focused IPOs.